FLOOD00591

• County: Weld
• Community: Greeley
• Stream Name: Cache La Poudre River
• Title: Floodplain and Floodway Analysis
• Date: 2/20/1994
• Prepared For: CWCB
• Prepared By: Brown & Caldwell
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Floodplain Report/Masterplan

I

I

FEDERAL EMERGENCY rv1Af\AGEMENT AGENCY
RIVERINE/COASTAL MAPPING FORM

fEMA USE ONL y

o MB Buraen No 3067.0148
Expires July 31 1994

PUIlLlC IlURUEN DISCLOSURE :'<UTln:

Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 1.5 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the
lime fur reviewin~ instructions, sClrching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and
completing and reviewing the form Send comments regarding the accuracy oflhc hurden estimate and any suggestion:..;
for reducing this burden. to: lnli)rrnation Collections :\Ianagement. Federal Emergency :\Ianagement Agency. 500 C
Street, S. W., W asb in~ton. DC 20472. and to the Omce of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3067-
01481. Washington. DC 20503.

I

I

Community Name:

City of Greeley

I

Flooding Source:

Cache La Poudre River

I

Project Name/Identifier:

1. MAPPING CHANGES

City of Greelev

I

I. ^ topographic work map of sUllablc scale, contour interval, and planimetric definition must be submitted showing
(indicate N/i\. Whf'fl flvl applicahle):

Included

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

2

3.

4.

A.
13.
C.
f)

Revised approximate 1 OO-year Ooodplain boundaries (Zone A) IXI Yes D :'<0 D N/A
Revised delailed 100- and 500-year Ooodplain boundaries ................ D Yes all '<0 D ':-oI/A
Revised 100.year Ooodway boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... IX! Yes D No D :'</A
Location and alig'nment of all cross sections used in the revised
hydraulic model with stal.ioningcontrol indicated I2[J Yes D ~o D ':'</A
Slream alignments, road and dam alignments ............ IXI Yes D No D '</A
Current community boundaries ................ ........ 0 Yes 0 ","0 [] "'"fA
Effective 100- and ,500-year floodplain and IOO-year floodway
boundaries from the I'IHM/FIWM reduced or enlarged to the
scale orthe topographic work map ............... 0 Yes IXI ~o 0 N/A
'fie-ins hetween the effecl.ive and revised 100- and SOD-year
floodplains and IOO-year floodway boundaries IXI Yes 0 ~o D :'</A
The requestor's property :)oundaries and community easements 0 Yes 0 ","0 [] N/A
The signed certification or a registered proressional engineer I2[J Yes 0 ~o 0 N/A
Location and description Drreference marks IXI Yes 0 \J() 0 N/A
Vertical dalum (example NGVIl, N A VI) elc.) IX! Yes 0 ","0 0 ","/A
Coastal I.one designations tie into adjacent areas not being revised D Yes 0 '10 KJ N/A
Lucation and alignment or all coastal transects used to revise the
coastal anulyses 0 Yes D No [] N/A

E.

I~' .
G.

II.

L
.1.
K.
I..
M.
N.

If any of the items above are marked no or N/A. please explain: (B) Detailed revisions to 100-vear
floodplain enclosed, changes to SOD-year foodplain negliable. (G) Final mapping
was not prepared by FEMA for portions of the study area.

Whal is the source and date of the updaled lopographic information (example: or/hoph% mal's, July 1911fi; field
survey, Muy /979, heach profiles, June 19117. ele.!? 1987 Aerial photography and 1993 field surveys

What is the scale and contour interval orthc following work maps?
a. Effective FlS scull'

b. Revision Request

Contour interval
Contour interval

1"=200'

2-foot

scale

NOTE: I{cviscd topographic i nrormution must be or equal or greater dclai I.

Attach an annotaled I.'IHM and I'llI'M at the scale "fthe e!Tective FlltM and FIWM showing the revised 100-year
and 500.yeur lloodplains and the IOO-year flood way boundurics and how they tie into those shown on the crrcctivc
FI RM and FBI" \1 downstream and upstream of the rev ision or adjacent to the area or revision for coastal studies.

Attach additional pages ifneeded.

I FEMA form 81-89D, AUG 93

..;

Riverine/Coastal Mapping ~Ofm

tOlm ~

Pa9~ 1 ot 3