My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00566
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:04 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:21:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Nature's Building Codes - Geology and Construction in Colorado
Date
8/1/1979
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
DNR
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />Americans sustain more than $1 bi II ion in damages annually <br />from landslides, mudflows, subsidence, avalanches, and other <br />common earth movements. The cost figures do not i nc I ude <br />earthquakes or loss of life. While no similar figures have <br />been campi led for Colorado, the price tag Is in the millions <br />of dollars. In Gal ifornla, where geologic hazards and <br />improper construction practices associated with them also <br />abound, planning officials project $300 million annually in <br />damages and related geologic hazard costs--nearly $3 bi II ion <br />in a decade. <br /> <br />At the same time the planners bel ieve the losses "could be <br />reduced 90 percent or more by a comb I nat I on of measures <br />involving adequate geologic interpretations, good engineering <br />practice, and effective enforcement of legal restraints on <br />land use and dlsturbance."l <br /> <br />The situation is put further into perspective by the <br />conclusion that "although slope fai lures generally are not so <br />spectacular or costly as certain other natural catastrophes <br />such as earthquakes, major floods, and tornadoes, they are <br />more widespread and the total financial loss due to slope <br />fa i lures ( I ands I I des, etc.) is probab I y greater than that for <br />any other geologic hazard to mankind."l <br /> <br />Another national study of nine natural hazards estimated the <br />losses in the tens of bi II Ions of dollars. It forecast <br />acce I erated property damage and deaths un less mi t I gat I on <br />measures are In i t i ated. It categor i ca I I Y pred i cted marked <br />reductions of losses (up to 85 percent) by implementing <br />geologic investigations, bui Iding and siting requirements <br />that acknowledge and compensate for known hazard areas.2 <br /> <br />1 landslidas: Analysis and Control, Spacial Heport 176, <br />Robert L. Schuster and Raymond J. Krizek, editors; National <br />Academy of Sciences, 1978; 234 p, <br /> <br />2"Natural Hazards--Earthquake, Landsl ide, Expansive Soi I <br />Loss Models,1I John H. Wiggins, James E. 510sson, James P. <br />Krohn; and "3ui Iding Losses from Natural Hazards: Yesterday, <br />Today and Tomorrow,11 Daniel H. Baer; J.H. Wiggins Company, <br />1650 South Pacific Highway, Hedondo 3each, CA, 90277; <br />December 1978, <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.