My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00515
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:51:01 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:19:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Title
Water Rights Determination Systems Study CWCB
Date
6/1/1987
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
953
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />Colorado water policy traditionally has <br />emphasized fle:nbility in the use of the state's <br />water resources. It promotes this objective in <br />several ways. FIBt, Colorado Jaw regards <br />water rights as wsted property rights which <br />may be freely transferred in the same manner <br />as other property rights. Second, it limits the <br />basis for legal review of changes of water <br />rights. Third, it treats water resources as <br />largely interchangeable and promotes their <br />optimal utilization. As a consequence of this <br />polity, transfers of water rights, changes of <br />rights, exchanges, and substituted supplies are <br />all common practices in Colorado. <br /> <br />This chapter presents the results of an <br />examination of Colorado law and experience <br />in the transfer of the use of water. The first <br />section provides a summa!)' of Colorado law <br />applying to water transfers. The second <br />section reports the results of an empirical <br />examination of all change-of-appropriative- <br />water-right activity involving a change in the <br />use of water between 1975 and 1984. Section <br />three presents a number of case studies <br />including an analysis of a random selection of <br />change cases filed between 1975 and 1984 as <br />well as more general studies of transfer of <br />. water right activity in lower Oear Creek <br />basin, in the South Park area, and in the <br />lower Arkansas basin. The fourth section <br />includes the results of our analysis of <br />transactions costs for nine randomly selected <br />change-of-water-right cases. The final section <br />attempts a preliminary analysis of several <br />important issues that emerge from this <br />research. These include questions about the . <br />effectiveness of the transfer review process <br />and the adequacy of review considerations. <br /> <br />&..6uu 1: <br /> <br />I.epl/IDltitutiooal Analysis <br /> <br />Water rights in Colorado are of two <br />basic types those based on appropriation of <br />water and those based on land ownership. <br /> <br />Simple changes in ownerShip of water rights <br />may oa:ur. without restriction. Transfers <br />involving changes in other. attnbutes . of the <br />water right such as purpose of use, however, <br />are subject to legal review. <br />, <br /> <br />This section begins with a brief <br />introduCtion to water rights law in Colorado. <br />Then it turns to the law respecting changes <br />of water rights. It describes other legal <br />mechanisms available in Colorado for <br />changing water use including exchanges, <br />substituted supplies, and plans for <br />augmentation. Next the section addresses the <br />transferability of a number of legally <br />distinctive categories of water. Finally it <br />discusses . the transferability of water uses <br />controlled by several types of water supply <br />organizations.' <br /> <br />Water Rights in ColonuJo <br /> <br />In its 1876 Constitution, Colorado <br />formally adopted the prior appropriation. <br />doctrine as the method for allocating rights <br />to the use of the water "of eve!)' natural <br />stream." Uniquely among the western states, <br />Colorado retains much of the original notion <br />of the appropriation doctrine that decisions <br />about allocation and use of the resource are <br />made by actions of individual appropriators, <br />with the role of the state primarily limited to <br />sorting out priorities. A specially constituted <br />water court "determines" that a physical <br />appropnation of water has occurred and that <br />the water has been applied to a beneficial <br />use.' It also determines the priority date of <br />the appropriation in a proceeding that <br />essentially amounts to an ongoing general <br />adjudication. The exercise of these water <br />rights is closely administered by the state <br />engineer's office through the seven division <br />engineers and the water commissioners <br />responsible for the state's streams.' A map of <br />Colorado showing the seven water divisions is <br />shown in Figure 1.1. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.