FLOOD00515 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Temporory C1uurges of Water Rights Colorado law authorizes the temporary loan or exchange of a water righL'" The exchange or loan may only be between those taking water from the same stream, and it must be either. for the purpose of saving crops or for using the water in a more economical manner. There is no need to obtain a court decree for such temporary loan or exchange;" however, notice in writing must be given to the division engineer including the length of time for which the loan or exchange is made." Temporary changes also are limited by the no injury requirement. In the event of a challenge to a temporary loan or exchange, the proponent of the temporary change must affirmatively demonstrate that no injury will result." TransferabiJiJy of Special ~ of Water The Colorado legal system has managed to transform the physically uniform substance of water into a sometimes bewildering array of legally distinctive categories. These legal distinctions can be important in understanding Colorado water transfer law. This section discusses designated groundwater, nontributary groundwater, imported water, salvaged water, conditional rights, contract water, interstate transfers, and tribal water. Transf= of ~ Groundwater The special statutory scheme that applies to groundwater within Co]orado's eight designated basins authorizes the change in a permit right. 71 The specific changes authorized include the acreage served, the volume of appropriation," the place, time, or type of use, and the well location. Application for the change is made to the . . Co]orado. Ground Water ComInission and notice of the application and hearing is made public." The change may only be granted subject to 'such terms and conditions as will not cause :ttatedal injury te the vested rights of other appropriators."" The injury standard governing a change in a designated groundwater right is the same' as that applying to other appropriative water rights." Specifically, possible increases in historical consumptive use and reductions in return flows are to be considered in determining if the change would cause material injury.76 The policy expressed by this standard is also the same: that a change of a water right may be allowed only when the change will not cause unreasonable harm to a prior appropriator." Under the Colorado Ground Water Management Act, groundwater management districts may be established." These districts are authorized to regulate the use, control, and conservation of the groundwater within their area.'" Among the measures specified is the power to prohibit the use of groundwater outside the boundaries of the district where such use materially affects the rights acquired by permit by any owner or operator of land within the district.'" The case of Danielson v. VICkroyl illustrates the relationship between designated groundwater and other water in the context of a change proceeding. Vickroy held a ditch right for water diverted from Kiowa Creek, an intermittent stream, and sought to change the point of diversion to a well in the alluvial aquifer underlying the creek in a water court proceeding. The proposed well was within the boundaries of a designated ground water basin and a ground water management district. The district objected to the change on the basis that the ground water commission had exclusive jurisdiction to consider such an application. After reviewing . the separate statutory schemes for designated groundwater and other. appropriable water, the Colorado Supreme Court concluded that the creation of a designated basin places the 7