My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00457
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:29:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:17:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
El Paso
Community
Colorado Springs and Manitou Springs
Title
Paleohydrologic Flood Investigations for Streams in Manitou Springs and Colorado Springs
Date
12/3/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the stream banks is 3 feet above the streambed. This indicates recent <br />streamflow have not exceeded about 200 cubic feet per second. <br />From the switchback in the road and downstream to where the <br />channel is contained in a long culvert the road (age unknown) has <br />modified and constricted the channel. The channel since the road was <br />built average 5 feet in width. Recent organic flood debris and in <br />channel small depositional features indicate the water may not have <br />been much deeper than about 3 to 4 feet in the last 10 to 20 years. <br />This would indicate a recent peak discharge of 200 cubic feet per <br />second. Had flows any larger than this occurred the Cave of the Winds <br />road would have received substantial damage. A review of maintenance <br />records (if kept and available) for the road flows may provide <br />additional flood information. Existing hydrology indicates peak <br />discharges frequently exceed 200 cubic feet per second; hence, the <br />road, particularly in the 'narrows' would be eroded often. Has this <br />been the case? <br /> <br />Ruxton Creek <br />Ruxton Creek drains 17.6 square miles and is steep, particularly <br />in the lower third of the basin. The channel is contained in a <br />concrete flume in Manitou Springs upstream to the Pikes Peak railroad <br />station; hence paleohydrologic studies could not be done. Upstream <br />from the railroad station the channel is filled with many large <br />boulders (some as large as houses) that have rolled off the steep <br />canyon walls into the channel. In many reaches the low streamflow <br />flows under these rocks. The channel at an elevation of about 6,800 <br />feet was moss and lichen covered except for about 2 feet above the <br />streambed. The channel here averages about 10 feet and the boulders <br />in the center of the channel are well rounded and polished smooth. <br />Small gravel bars occur, there is some evidence of erosion of the <br />channel banks, and some trees in the channel recent scars and contain <br />flood debris. The channel evidence suggests that recent flows had a <br />depth of 2 feet; hence, assuming a mean velocity of 10 feet per second <br />the peak discharge is estimated to be about 200 cubic feet per second. <br />This discharge is one that is considered to occur frequently, say once <br />every year or two. <br />At an elevation of 7,000 feet, the only significant flood <br />deposits that ,could be identified in any part of Ruxton Creek, are <br />flood deposits! consisting of boulders 12 to 18 inches in diameter on <br />the side of the channel and lodged against a 2-foot diameter spruce <br />(estimated to be about 120 years old) to a depth of 4 feet. Channel <br />width is 25 feet; the mean depth is 3 feet. These deposits represent <br />the largest flood that has occurred in Ruxton Creek had a peak <br />discharge of approximately 750 to 1000 cubic feet per second. (These <br />deposits probably were from the 1882 flood (U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers, Flood Plain Information report, Fountain Creek, 1974). <br />Moss and extensive lichen cover boulders in the channel to within 1- <br />foot of the streambed. Boulders in the channel are not very well <br />rounded indicating floods do not move the boulders very frequently, <br />nor are they abraided by sediment-laden water. <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.