My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00457
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:29:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:17:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
El Paso
Community
Colorado Springs and Manitou Springs
Title
Paleohydrologic Flood Investigations for Streams in Manitou Springs and Colorado Springs
Date
12/3/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />were noted to determine the approximate age 01 the tree and deposit). <br />As a general guide in this study, trees that had been cut (within <br />about the last month) along the Pikes Peak railroad right-01-way along <br />Ruxton Creek were used to estimate tree diameter and age relations 10r <br />several spruce (believed to be Englemann spruce) trees. For example, <br />a 2-inch spruce had 10 annual growth rings, a 4-inch spruce had 35 <br />annual growth rings, and, a 15-inch spruce had 70 annual growth rings. <br />These can be used to estimate the relative age 01 spruce trees on the <br />1100d deposits (roughly, 1 inch 01 diameter represents 5 years 01 <br />growth), hence, an approximate time since the deposits were 10rmed. <br />In mountain channels not subject to signi1icantly out 01 bank <br />110ws, channel conditions are much di11erent. These channels <br />generally show very little evidence 01 sediment movement and channel <br />erosion or depositional 1eatures. Bed material show no evidence <br />signi1icant movement, channel banks are well vegetated with grass and <br />moss (Figure 2B). Boulders and bedrock just above the water level <br />generally are covered extensively with moss and lichen indicating that <br />flood waters have not disturbed the channel 10r a long time. <br />Vegetation, even those growing immediately next to the channel do not <br />show any, or only minimal, evidence 01 scarring 1rom 1100d debris. <br />There is no vegetative 1100d debris lodged upstream 1rom obstructions. <br />The height 01 the 1100d deposits and scarred trees provide an <br />indication 01 the approximate flood depth; widths can be measured in <br />the channel at these sites and to then estimate mean 1100d depth. <br />From these, approximate cress-sectional area can be estimated. Then <br />methods can be use to estimate velocity (extensive work has shown that <br />a reasonable mean 1100d velocity in these mountain channels is 10 1eet <br />per second and was used 10r this investigations) and peak discharge. <br />A mean velocity of 10 1eet per second is conservative (overestimated) <br />10r recent 110ws. <br />Onsite investigations to locate 1100d erosional and depositional <br />1eatures were conducted in Ruxton Creek (the stream considered to have <br />the greatest 1100d hazard), Williams Canyon, Fountain Creek (and <br />tributaries upstream 1rom Manitou Springs), Sutherland Creek, and Camp <br />Creek (Figure 1). For the paleo1100d investigations in this study, <br />channels were inspected to indenti1Y erosional and depositional <br />1eatures (indicators) 01 out of bank 1100ding. Use 01 the <br />paleohydrologicj techniques described above has allowed 10r the <br />estimation 01 3 general level 01 1100ds, recent (or 1requent), in the <br />last 10 years, medium, in the last 30 to 100 years, and, the maximum <br />flood, greater than 100 years. These onsite investigations are <br />representative 01 110w conditions for a reach of channel. These <br />observations are discussed below for each creek, starting with the <br />most downstream basin. Estimates 01 width, depth, discharge, and <br />approximate time since a 1100d 10r recent, medium, and the largest <br />observable 1100d are shown 10r the sites investigated on Figure 1. <br />These investigations were only made in natural stream channels <br />upstream from urban development because this development disturbs the <br />1100d deposits. Time was not available to visit other tributaries, <br />such as Cheyenne and Bear Creeks, but these investigations are <br />believed to provide an understanding 01 the local 1100d hydrology. <br /> <br />,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.