Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Colorado W51h,,," Cons"""lIation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />FINDINGS AIUD DETERMINATIONS FOR RUl.E 5 <br /> <br />Stream names: <br />{)IR Q },C <br /> <br />DETAILED INFORMATION <br />1?41141-.l1~ {A-Uk... ~w:1&, 6w.l,,-,! fJ!1.M. i?"'J:j"'A <br />f I <br /> <br />Communities: <br /> <br />Report title: <br />Report date: <br />Engineer: (If different from title) <br />Prior Designation No. (is any) <br /> <br />Does the topographic base mapping meet the minimum <br />standar'ds of Rule 5,A,? <br /> <br />~yes <br /> <br /> <br />/yes <br /> <br /> no <br />-- no <br /> / <br />-'- no <br />_...~.._- no <br /> 7 <br /> no <br /> no <br /> no <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Does the hydrologic analyses meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5,B.? <br /> <br />Halle the effects of dams been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 7 ? <br /> <br />_.._ yes <br /> <br />Does the hydraulic analysis meet the minimum <br />of Rule 5,C. ? <br /> <br />standards v: <br />_.._._ yes <br /> <br />Have the effects of lellees been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 8 ? yes <br /> <br />Does the published report and map meet the minimum ~ <br />standards of Rule 5,D.? L/ yes <br /> <br />Was the information delle loped by 01 qualified indillidual/ <br />meeting standards of Rule 5.E.? -1L yes <br /> <br />Reviewer's Comments: <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: <br />Reason for d i sapprollal: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />Disapprove <br /> <br />Recommended by: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-4-- <br />