Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ~ <br /> <br />."_::.l.o~"",,,,",.c~-.-;...<_.---,-..- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Unfortunately, its arrival and that of the gust front from the earlier storm in central <br />Jefferson County coincided, Figure 7 shows the path of the storm complex from <br />715PM to 900PM. It is very possible that the storm would not have gone <br />stationary if the gust front had not provided a focus for a strong inflow of moist, <br />unstable air into the storm complex, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The radar-rainfall maps in Appendix B should be consulted for the <br />incremental rainfall by time for the flash flooding period, Review of these maps <br />suggests that the peak rainfall production occurred from 815PM until 900PM <br />over the lower third of the basin. During this period over 3.00 inches of rain fell <br />over the lower third of the basin, The rain was accompanied by hail at times, <br />especially before 830PM, By 913PM the core of the storm had moved eastward <br />over the Spring Creek watershed which experienced the same amounts of rain <br />as the lower third of Buffalo Creek between 900PM and 945PM. ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 8 shows the HMS radar-estimated storm rainfall from 739PM until <br />913PM across the Buffalo Creek basin, The basin average rainfall during this <br />period was 2,16 inches of rain with a peak 0,5 square mile rainfall of 5.13 <br />inches. During this period, an 18 square mile area of the lower third of the basin <br />received over 3.25 inches of rain while a core area of 6 square miles just <br />above the town of Buffalo Creek was inundated by over 4 inches of rain and <br />hail. HMS removed hail contamination from its rainfall estimates by not including <br />the peak 10 minute rainfall estimates in its precipitation mapping. In effect, this <br />process eliminated just over an inch of rain from the mapping which may have <br />been used for hail production by the storm, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 9 shows the July 12, 1996 storm total rainfall over the basin for the <br />entire period from 21 OPM until 1 023PM when the last showers of consequence <br />cleared the basin. The basin average rain increases to 2.49 inches while the <br />peak 0.5 square mile increases to 6.29 inches, The lower third of the basin <br />shows an average rainfall of just over 4.00 inches. Clearly, this thunderstorm <br />rainfall was focussed by the stationary movement of the storm over the <br />basin for about 30-45 minutes. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Another contributing factor to the flash flood may have been the slow <br />movement down the basin of the rainfall core which could have aided in <br />producing a runoff maximum that traveled with the storm. This storm was the <br />only one which went stationary over northeastern Colorado, All the other storm <br />complexes moved at speeds of 25 to 40 mph while producing severe weather. It <br />appears that the gust front which aided storm intensification and inhibited storm <br />motion was a major contributing weather feature to the storm's severity along <br />with the very moist condition of the atmosphere. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />14 <br />