Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />TECHNIQUES OF WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />efficients are statistically significant at the 1 <br />percent level. The standard error of log Q,o is <br />smaller than that of either log Q2 or log Q2" <br />probably because the regression for log Q,o is <br />based on only 10 stations whose records may <br />be less independent than are the records for <br />the 18 stations used in the other regressions. <br />It should not be assumed that Q" can be esti- <br />mated more closely than the others because it <br />has the smallest standard error. <br />Equations applied to a specific site to obtain <br />discharges corresponding to several recur- <br />rence intervals may not produce points that <br />lie on a smooth curve. To check the equations <br />for the Snohomish River example, assume a <br />basin of 300 square miles with a mean annual <br />precipitation of 150 inches. The 2-, 25-, and <br />50-year flood peaks computed by slide rule are <br />35,500, 83,000, and 97,600 cfs respectively. <br />These are plotted in figure 3 along with results <br />from a 300-square-mile basin having 50 inches <br />of precipitation. The results appear to be con- <br />sistent. <br />A frequency curve could be drawn to aver- <br />age the computed points, but this is usually not <br />justified unless a set of equations produces a <br />large-recurrence-interval flood which is small- <br />er than one computed for a smaller recurrence <br />interval. This condition does not appear pos- <br />sible with the equations derived for this exam- <br />ple, although it can occur with equations from <br />some analyses. <br /> <br /> I I I I <br />(; 100 - , - <br />~ <br />" <br />z <br />""" <br />~z <br />"0 <br />Ou <br />,"w <br />~~ <br />~: <br />.L <br />w~ 10 - <br />Ow 0 <br />~w <br />""~ 0 <br />'"u <br />u- <br />~.. <br />-:> 0 <br />"u <br />~ <br />"" <br />W <br />L <br /> , <br /> 2 10 25 50 <br /> RECURRENCE tNHRVAl, IN YEAliS <br /> 3. Plol of computed floods for hypolfletical basins. <br /> <br />The object of a regional study usually is to <br />define the floods corresponding to two or three <br />recurrence intervals at ungaged sites, not to <br />define the entire frequency curve. The 2-year <br />flood and the mean annual flood (2.33-yr) are <br />of limited interest. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Regionalization of characteristics of the <br />frequency distribution <br /> <br />Both the index-flood method and the regres- <br />sion method regionalize peak discharges at <br />specific recurrence intervals; in the above <br />example separate regressions were made for <br />floods at the 2-, 25- and 50-year recurrence <br />intervals. These discharges at individual sites <br />, were selected from the station frequency <br />curves which may be either graphically or <br />analytically defined. <br />If the station frequency curves are obtained <br />by analytically fitting the same theoretical <br />frequency distribution to data for each sta- <br />tion, the differences among those frequency <br />curves can be described by the differences in <br />the computed parameters of the theoretical <br />distribution. A two-parameter distribution <br />can be described by its mean and variance (or <br />standard deviation). A three-parameter dis- <br />tribution will require an index of skewness in <br />addition to the mean and variance. <br />Then a regionalization procedure might <br />consist of relating separately the mean, the <br />variance, and the skewness to basin character- <br />istics by the regression method. These three <br />parameters, estimated from the regression <br />equations for a specific site will define the <br />regionalized frequency curve not only in the <br />defined range but also beyond that range <br />where its use is not justified. In practice, re- <br />gressions are computed for the mean and for <br />the standard deviation only. A mean value of <br />skew is usually applied to a region of consid- <br />erable size because the computed skew from <br />an individual record is highly unreliable. <br />Regionalization of parameters of the frequen- <br />cy curve is described by Beard (1962, section <br />7). Fitting of station data to a Pearson Type <br />III distribution is described in book 4, chapter <br />A2 of "Techniques of Water Resources Inves- <br />tigations" {Riggs 1968b) and by Water Re- <br />sources Council (1967). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.,1 <br />i' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />