Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />the fifteenth year (10 years after the occurrence of the 12,000 c.f.s. <br />peak) was only 700 c. f. s. The third 10 year period might have included <br />one max1IIIum annual peak of 20,000 c.f.s. and another of 18,000 c.f.s. <br />By this time we wouJ.d probab~ have arrived at the correct conclusion <br />that individual peak. rates of runoff are not spaced equally in t1me. <br /> <br />Average Frequencies and Average Recurrence Intervals <br /> <br />So far we have dealt with only a tiny segment of the life history <br />of the strearn anu thus have been able to examine only a small sample of <br />the aJmost illfini te number of possible combinations of maximum annual <br />peak rates. When we think of the stream as having been flowing for a <br />thousand years or more, it no longer seems surprisin<! that the only <br />co~clusion concerning frequency that we were able to draw from 30 years <br />of recora _s tLat peak rates of e:rry selected magnitude are not spaced <br />eqtlaD.y in ti:ne. <br /> <br />If we haa a 1000 year streamflow record available and were to <br />plot the maxl.'!lUlll annual peaks on graph pa.per, it ..ould probably look <br />ver: si:lilar to fieure 2. Of' course, no such 1000 year record exists <br />a.r.d figure 2 is merely a. synthetic presentation of one of the almost <br />u!'..li1:J. ted nwaber of possible coL1binations of rr.a.:d.mUln annual peak rates <br />tha~. could occur in a lOOO-year period. For each lO-,year period in thi 5 <br />.;raph, the ',lBJCimum annual peak rates equal to or greater than 13,000 <br />c.f.s. have been plotted 0.0; though they had occurr<;d ir:. ,hoe mi<1<i:..e 00: <br />the period. If.e were to cou.nt the number of peaks that ..ere equal <br />to cr grea+er than 13,000 c.r.s. we wouJ.d find that there were l~ such <br />peaitS in the first 100 ,'ear::; or an average of one in 10 :J<-ears. If, <br />however, 1o'e were to rr.a.ke our count for the period of year 50 to year <br />1~0 we wouJ.d find that -t..here was only six and that the number for the <br />period year 150 to year 250 was 14. Thus we see that average occurr- <br />ences obtained from 100 year records wouJ.d not give us consistent results <br />since they could be expected to vary from once in 7 years to once <br />in 17 years. If our averages had been obtained froc-. consecutive 200 <br />year periods, however, the variation wouJ.d: have been from once in 8 years <br />to once in 11 years and when obtained from 5oo-year periods the averages <br />"'oulli have been a consistent once in 10 years. <br /> <br />Although it is true that no recurrence interval can be assigned <br />to a solitary peak rate of runoff, the above example demonstrates that, <br />for a long period of time an a.verage recurrence interval exists for <br />peaks that are equal to or greater than any selected minimum. <br /> <br />3-3 <br />