My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00385
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Boulder Creek
Title
South Boulder Creek Interim Hydrology Study
Date
7/1/2000
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
Taggart Engineering Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Bill DeGroot <br />July 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />We observed several discrepancies in the Corps' SWMM model during the Phase I <br />and II studies. The two most important deficiencies include: 1) the drainage area <br />in the Corp model is significantly less than the actual watershed area, and 2) the <br />peak one-hour rainfall is less than that prescribed by local, regional, and National <br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) procedures. In this Phase III <br />study we determined that modifications were required for the Gross Reservoir <br />storage and spillway characteristics, the stream hydraulics, and the land runoff <br />characteristics. Changes were required to address each of these discrepancies. <br /> <br />During Phase III, we have constructed an essentially new hydrology model using <br />the UDFCD UDSWMM computer program, but using portions of the Corps' model <br />as a starting point. The following have been incorporated. <br /> <br />1. Revised rainfall using National Oceanic Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). City, <br />County, UDFCD, and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) procedures. <br />2. Electronic base mapping using City, County, and U.S. Geologic Survey <br />(USGS) sources. Basins, streams, and other model features are delineated <br />on this base. <br />3. Basin-wide review of National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS or <br />formerly SCSI and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) soils and ground surface <br />mapping to identify infiltration and other rainfall loss characteristics. <br />4. Updated Phase II model data downstream of Highway 36. <br />5. Detailed new modeling for the area from' Eldorado Springs to Highway 36. <br />6. Correction of all Corps' modeling upstream of Gross Reservoir and <br />redelineation of all basins downstream of Gross Reservoir. <br />7. Reasonableness comparisons with Eldorado Gage Data, Colorado Unit <br />Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP) modeling of representative secondary <br />watersheds, unit discharge (cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre). and <br />regional discharge relationships. <br /> <br />The modeling was performed in accordance with regulatory requirements which <br />do not permit incorporation of storage that exists in Gross Reservoir below the <br />spillway and upstream of the rail line at many south tributary locations from the <br />foothills to upstream of Gross Reservoir. The large floodplains below Eldorado <br />Springs provide dynamic storage which is not well simulated by UDSWMM. <br />Under actual conditions, this storage would attenuate the 1 OO-year flood peaks <br />below the figures in this report for South Boulder Creek downstream of Gross <br />Reservoir. For this reason and others elaborated herein, we believe this hydrology <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.