My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00385
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Boulder Creek
Title
South Boulder Creek Interim Hydrology Study
Date
7/1/2000
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
Taggart Engineering Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mountain Modelinq <br /> <br />Comparison of statistical analysis of the Eldorado Gage stream flow data with the <br />UDSWMM deterministic model reveals an apparent disparity as the statistical <br />methods give lower discharges than UDSWMM. We believe this is explained by the <br />flood storage which is taking place in Gross Reservoir and the numerous storages <br />upstream of the Moffatt rail line. To a lesser degree, refining the South Boulder <br />Creek channel routing parameters based on representative field survey sections <br />might reduce (or increase) the UDSWMM model result. <br /> <br />Storage exists upstream of the rail line on South Draw, the major tributary above <br />the Eldorado gage. Other storages upstream of the rail line can be observed on the <br />topographic maps, but we have not documented their characteristics or effects. <br />Further, the Denver Water operational data for Gross Reservoir illustrate significant <br />storage of flood type events, such as the flood of May 1969. <br /> <br />The regulations only allow recognition of storage above fixed spillways of water <br />supply storage operated by governmental entities. Specifically prohibited is <br />recognition of storages such as those formed by rail lines unless there are <br />institutional agreements and the facilities are documented as adequate. Therefore, <br />there are only two basic choices regarding selection of analytical model techniques: <br /> <br />1.a) Make institutional arrangements to either preserve the operational practices <br />of Denver Water which result in flood storage, or explore other institutional <br />arrangements and improvements which would enhance storage at Gross. <br />b) Investigate characteristics, needed physical improvement, and make <br />institutional arrangement with the Railway to preserve or enhance this <br />storage. <br />c) Refine the UDSWMM modeling accordingly to reflect the physical condition <br />and changed facilities, comparing again with statistical methods if the <br />physical and operational conditions are the same. <br /> <br />Or <br /> <br />2. Don't rely on the statistical data at the Eldorado gage, since it represents the <br />result of inadvertent storage. <br /> <br />The sponsors have decided to proceed with the latter choice and issue this report <br />on an Interim Basis, since making arrangements with Denver Water and the Railway <br />could take too long. The sponsors are pursuing possible cooperative arrangements <br />with Denver Water. They may pursue storage with the Railway, both to evaluate <br />washout hazards and for flood control, but at a later date after the Master Planning <br />effort has made significant progress toward an agreed solution. <br /> <br />1-17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.