My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00377
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00377
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:14:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Clear Creek
Community
Silver Plume
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Town of Silver Plume
Date
6/6/2001
Prepared For
Silver Plume
Prepared By
FEMA
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fill, reduces flood-carrying capacity, <br />increases flood heights and velocities, and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the <br />encroachment itself. One aspect of floodl'lain management involves balancing the <br />economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting increase in flood hazard. <br />For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities in this <br />aspect of floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the 100-year floodplain <br />is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway is the channel of a <br />stream, plus any adjacent floodplain areas, that must be kept free of encroachment so that <br />the lOO-year flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. Minimum <br />Federal standards limit such increases to I foot, provided that hazardous velocities are not <br />produced. The floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum <br />standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a basis for additional flood way <br />studies. <br /> <br />The floodways presented in this study were computed for cer;ain stream segments on the <br />basis of equal-conveyance reduction from each side of the floodplain. Floodway widths <br />were computed at cross sections. Between cross sections, the floodway boundaries were <br />interpolated. The results of the floodway computations are tabulated for selected cross <br />sections (see Table 2, "Floodway Data"). In cases where the floodway and 100-year <br />floodplain boundaries are either close together or collinear. only the flood way boundary <br />is shown. Downstream of Interstate 70 at Silver Plwne, no floodway encroachments were <br />made because of high flow velocities. <br /> <br />The area between the floodway and lOO-year floodplain boundaries is termed the floodway <br />fringe. The floodway fringe encompasses the portion of the floodplain that could be <br />completely obstructed without increasing the water-surface elevation of the 100-year flood <br />more than I foot at any point. Typical relationships between the floodway and the <br />floodway fringe and their significance to floodplain development are shown in Figure 1. <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />l00.YEARFlOOOPlAlN <br />fLOODWAY 1- flOOOWA.Y <br />fRINGE <br />S1lI:E.&..M <br />CHANNEL <br /> <br />LOODWAY <br />H~IN(jr <br /> <br />ROQOHEVATION WIiEN <br />CONFINED WITHIN FLOOOWAY <br /> <br /> <br />FLQODELEVATION 8EFOFlE <br />ENCROACHMENT OPII FLOODPLAIN <br /> <br />UNE A8 IS THE flOOD ELEVATION SHORE ENC!\OACHMENT. <br />LINE COIS THE fLOOD ELEvATION AFTER ENCROACHMENT. <br />-'iUIKHARGE IS NOT TO ExceeD 1.0 fOOT (FIA REQUIREMENT) OR LtSS~R AMOUNT IF SPECIFIED liv STAn: <br /> <br />Figure I. Floodway Schematic <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.