Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPtER IV <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Flood Characteristics <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flood flows in the Upper Arkansas River basin occur primarily during <br /> <br /> <br />the May-July period. These high flows are caused basically by snowmelt and <br /> <br /> <br />are augmented occasionally by rain. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ I <br />I I <br />i I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />; I <br />I <br /> <br />Methods of Analysis <br /> <br />Extensive hydrologic analysis was performed by WRC, Inc, for the adjoin- <br /> <br /> <br />ing upstream floodplain information report, The majority of that analysis is <br /> <br /> <br />also applicable to the downstream study reach. Basically, the previous data <br /> <br />was updated and the potential runoff from the additional 14 square miles of <br /> <br /> <br />drainage area to the river mouth Was evaluated, Flood flows were increased, <br /> <br /> <br />as necessary, to include the additional contributing area. The following <br /> <br /> <br />sections describe the entire method of analysis including tasks performed <br /> <br /> <br />previously. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis entailed utilizing a number of different methods <br /> <br /> <br />to'compute the peak flow for the four different frequencies, Four such methods <br /> <br /> <br />were utilized inCluding the U.S. Geological Survey Regional Analysis, Regional <br /> <br /> <br />Statistics / Log-Pearson, Regional Log-Pearson type III Analysis (with and <br /> <br /> <br />without the 1957 data point), and Technical Manual No.1. The results for <br /> <br />the 1% flood which were obtained by these four methods compared closely with <br /> <br /> <br />the recorded historic peak flows and peak flows per unit area from nearby <br /> <br />watersheds. The detailed computations for the different methods were submit- <br /> <br /> <br />ted to the Colorado Water Conservation Board as part of the technical addendum. <br /> <br />- I <br />i I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-19- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrologic Procedures <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis was directed toward calculating the 10-, 50-, <br /> <br /> <br />100-, and 500-year frequency flood discharges in the study reaches. This <br /> <br /> <br />analysis is based on the existing basin development conditions, Further <br /> <br /> <br />development within the basin is assumed to be insignificant and thus it is <br /> <br /> <br />not considered in the peak flow analysis, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Streamflow data from 11 measuring stations located within the Upper <br /> <br /> <br />Arkansas River basin was used in this analysis, A list of these stations <br /> <br /> <br />with their respective drainage areas and periods of recorded peak flows is <br /> <br />presented in Table-I. The source of this data is the official U.S. Geologi- <br /> <br /> <br />cal Survey water supply papers. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The peak flow figures for the four different frequencies used in the <br /> <br />hydraulic analysis of this study were those obtained from a Regional Log- <br /> <br />Pearson Type III Analysis (including the 1957 data point). The 1957 peak <br /> <br /> <br />flow for the South Arkansas River was obtained from a set of correlations <br /> <br /> <br />that resulted in a relationship obtained from the period of common records <br /> <br /> <br />between the South Arkansas River near Salida and the Arkansas River at Salida. <br /> <br /> <br />A set of graphs were developed showing the drainage area in square miles <br /> <br /> <br />versus peak flow for the four different frequencies. The data from the <br /> <br /> <br />eleven gaging stations was used initially to plot such graphs. Based on <br /> <br />further analysis of the different drainage basins, it was determined that <br /> <br /> <br />the final plots of such graphs would be based on the data from the gaging <br /> <br /> <br />stations representative of the study area, The results were plotted and <br /> <br /> <br />are presented in Figure-I. A plot of discharge versus frequency is shown <br /> <br />in Figure-2 for Obtaining flood flows for various frequency intervals. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Using Figure-l and the drainage areas of the reaches for the South <br /> <br /> <br />Arkansas River, peak flows for the four different frequencies were obtained. <br /> <br /> <br />The values for such flows at selected points are presented in Table-2. In <br /> <br />Figure-3, the variation of anticipated flows through the study area is <br /> <br /> <br />presented as a function of distance upstream from the river mouth, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-20- <br />