Laserfiche WebLink
<br />only if hydraulic structures <br />properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />remain <br /> <br />unobstructed, <br /> <br />operate <br /> <br />The City of Florence identified Oak Creek as having potential <br />flood hazards during storm events. Based on discussions with <br />City representatives, a hydraulic baseline was drawn along the <br />centerline of Oak Creek. The width of the cross sections varies <br />based on the extent of the flood plains. The lower limit of this <br />revision is approximately 330 feet upstream of the confluence <br />with the Arkansas River (3+30) and the upper limit is <br />approximately 70 feet upstream of the abandoned Atchison, Topeka <br />and Santa Fe Railroad (98+89). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's "n") used in the hydraulic <br />analysis were determined using engineering judgement and based on <br />field observations, orthophoto topographic mapping, and ground <br />level photography of the channel and flood plain areas. Factors <br />affecting the determination of the Manning I s "n" include channel <br />material, channel irregularity, obstructions, vegetation, and the <br />degree of channel meandering. The roughness value used for the <br />main channel was 0.045, and for the flood plain areas the <br />roughness values range from 0.035 to 0.15. The selected <br />roughness coefficients are referenced in tables presented in the <br />handbook Cpen Channel Hydraulics (Reference 19). <br /> <br />The recorrunended values for the contraction and expansion <br />coefficients for gradual transitions are 0.1 and 0.3, <br />respectively. When the change in effective cross-sectional area <br />is abrupt and increased losses occur, such as at bridges or <br />cuI verts, the recorrunended contraction and expansion coefficients <br />are 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. <br /> <br />The computer program HEC-RAS (Reference 18) was used to develop <br />the 10.0%-, 2.0%-, 1.0%-, and 0.2%-chance water surface <br />elevations for Oak Creek. The computer analysis uses the mixed <br />flow regime method which computes both supercri tical and <br />subcritical solutions. For the supercritical flow regime, the <br />model starts with critical at the upstream cross section. The <br />subcritical flow regime uses the downstream cross section and the <br />slope-area method for computing the water surface elevations for <br />the 10.0%-, 2.0%-, 1.0%-, and 0.2%-chance floods. Although Oak <br />Creek is supercritical, the bridge or culvert crossings are <br />subcritical and the backwater affects several cross sections <br />upstream of the structures. <br /> <br />Users should be aware that flood elevations shown on the FIRM <br />represent rounded whole-foot elevations and may not exactly <br />reflect the elevations shown on the Flood Profiles or in the <br />Floodway Data tables in the FIS report. Flood elevations shown <br />on the FIRM are primarily intended for flood insurance rating <br />purposes. For construction and/or floodplain management <br />purposes, users are cautioned to use the flood elevation data <br />presented in this FIS in conj unction with the data shown on the <br />FIRM. <br /> <br />14 <br />