Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />two features that were not used in this analysis: two station comparisons and weighting of <br />independent estimates. A generalized coefficient of skew of - 0.3 was adopted for all three stations <br />based on the generalized skew map presented in Bulletin 17B. <br /> <br /> <br />A review of the peak flow data for the two Roaring Fork River stations and for the Eagle River <br />station shows that all recorded peak annual discharges occurred from late May through early July. <br />Ten out of the 212 peak annual discharges occurred during early July. Floods could occur as a result <br />of rapid snowmelt or rainfall alone, or a combination of those events. While floods as a result of <br />rainfall alone could be important for small drainage areas, peak flow records show snowmelt is the <br />primary cause of peaks at the three stations studied. Rainfall may have contributed some runoff to <br />a few of the annual peak flows, but it is very difficult to identify the amount of contribution from <br />available hydrologic records. Rainfall did not result in independent peak discharge events because <br />the peaks occurred during the snowmelt season and snowmelt would also have contributed to them. <br />This conclusion is reasonably consistent with results of computations for larger streams during <br />previous regional hydrologic studies. Computing independent flood frequencies for rainfall and <br />snowmelt events and combining those frequencies on a probability basis to obtain the all-season <br />curve is not a practical approach at these three gaging sites. <br /> <br />Roaring Fork River <br /> <br />Determining flood frequency values for the study reach of the Roaring Fork River is complex <br />because there are no streamgages near the study area and analyses must use an indirect method. <br />Flood frequency computations were made for the two existing USGS stations on the Roaring fork <br />River using their entire periods of record: station near Aspen (09073400) and Station at Glenwood <br />Springs (0908500). <br /> <br />The original Aspen station started recording stream flow data in 1911 and continued operating until <br />1964. Data for the year of 1913 and for the period of 1922 to 1931 were not recorded, A 43-year <br />peak flow series for the Roaring Fork River is therefore available for the original gage location. In <br />October of 1964 the gage was moved to a nearby location and improved, It is now a water-stage <br />recorder with satellite telemetry. A 32-year peak flow discharge series through 1996 is available for <br />the existing gage location. The total series of peak discharges at the Aspen gage is therefore 75 years <br />long. <br /> <br />The Glenwood Springs station started recording data in October 1905. The series of annual peak <br />flows includes the years 1906 through 1909 ( 4 years), 1912, 1914 through 1981 (68 years), and the <br />period from 1983 through the current year. The data available for this study includes the year 1996 <br />(14 years). The peak flow series available for this study is therefore 87 years. A printout of the <br />results of flood frequency computations for the 75-year Aspen series and the 87 -year Glenwood <br />Springs series is presented in the Appendix. As shown in the Appendix printouts, peak flow data <br />recorded at a new gage location or data for years not yet included in the HYDRODA T A compact <br />disk file are added to the series by program FFFREAK as Historic Data. The new longer series is <br />then analyzed following the guidelines of Bulletin 17B. <br /> <br />4 <br />