Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />b. The 1973 study used the routed outflow from Standley Lake as It existed at <br />that time. The 1986 study was based on the routed outflow from Standley <br />Lake through a future spillway under a current agreement between the <br />UD&FCD and the city of West minster. <br />5. Improvements to the Ketner Reservoir and spi1lway have been completed since <br />the 1986 report was finIshed. These Improvements reduce the peak dIscharge <br />rate enterIng the area upstream of the exIstIng C&S Railroad culvert. <br />6. The size of the watershed upstream of Standley Lake and the volume of tempor- <br />ary storage available above the lake's surface Is such that the peak outflow rate <br />from the lake Is delayed long enough so that It has no effect on the peak dis- <br />charge rate at the railroad culvert. ThIs peak is governed by only the tributary <br />drainage area between the railroad and the Standley Lake dam. <br />7. The existing concrete arch culvert under the C&S Railroad is inadequate to <br />convey the 10o-year flood event wIthout causing excessive depths of flow <br />upstream of the culvert. This Is the prlncipa I reason that runoff from a major <br />flood impacts the Bruchez property. <br />8. The hydraulIc efficiency of the existing railroad culvert can be Increased by <br />constructing an Improved Inlet at the entrance to the culvert. <br />9. SufficIent temporary storage exists upstream of the existing railroad culvert, <br />either In total or only wIthin the floodway limits, to signIfIcantly reduce the <br />peak dIscharge rate flowing through the culvert. <br />10. The effects of the Improved Inlet on a decrease In the water surface elevatIon <br />are not reflected upstream of Wadsworth Parkway. <br />II. Using the approved outflow from Standley Lake, the decreased outflow from the <br />