Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />pond that, accordlno to the 1986 studY, would be 25 feet deep at the time the peak <br />discharge rate was approaching the culvert. <br /> <br />However, this Is not what would physically occur at the site. The depth of water <br /> <br /> <br />upstream from the culvert entrance will only rise to the height necessary to permit <br /> <br /> <br />the peak outflow rate to pass throuah the culvert as Illustrated In Figure 5, i. e. , <br /> <br /> <br />the peak of the outflow hydrograph. The shaded area is the volume of storage up- <br /> <br /> <br />stream of the culvert being utilized. The greater the available volume of storage, <br /> <br /> <br />the greater w1l1 be the reduction In peak flow rate. <br /> <br />Total ExlsUng Volume <br />Using the available topographic mapping, the total volume of storage presently <br />existing upstream of the culvert was determined. The total available storage at <br />2-foot Intervals Is listed In Table 2. If the water surface elevation upstream of the <br />railroad culvert were 5364, about 300 acre feet of runoff would be temporarily <br />stored upstream of the culvert. <br /> <br />ExlsUng Volume Within the Floodway <br />At some point In the future, the land outside of the floodway upstream of the <br />railroad culvert could be f1I1ed. This would reduce the amount of storage available <br />for the temporary detention of flood water. For this reason, the volume of avail- <br />able storage upstream of the railroad culvert was recalculated, assuming that the <br />land outside the floodway had indeed been f1I1ed. These results are also listed In <br />Table 2. <br />