Laserfiche WebLink
<br />104 <br /> <br />Wetland Classific~tion <br /> <br />Until recently wetland classification systems were developed and <br />designed as regional systems or designed primarily to evaluate wetlands for <br />use as water fowl habitat (U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Although the <br />regional systems and the Fish and Wildlife Service system produced valuable <br />baseline data, it ~s not generally possible to compare wetlands on a <br />national or international scale. Recognized wetland habitat losses prompted <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service to initiate a l\ational we tlands inventory in <br />1974 to supplement and update the agency's previous inv,entory conducted in <br />1954. A major outcome of the most recent inventory was the development of a <br />hierarchical taxonomic type system of classification th,at incorporates three <br />fundamental components of wetlands: soil, hydrology and vegetation <br />(Cowardin et al. 1979). The system has gained consider,able support after <br />extensive peer review, comments from state and federal ;ogencies, field <br />testing, and use during the early phases of the 1974 inventory. It has been <br />offiCially adopted by the Fish and Wildlife Service (45 Federal Register <br />65322, 10-2-80) and more recently by the Soil Conservation Service pending <br />results of field trials, and is rapidly gainIng international recognition. <br /> <br />The primary objective of the cl.usific8l:ion system is to impose <br />boundaries on natural and man created wetland ecosystew. for purposes of <br />inventory, evaluation, comparison, mctnagement and llben iapplicable, <br />mitigation of impacts to wetlands caused by Dlan's activHies. <br /> <br />l1'1e classification system progresses fr()m SYSTEMS and SUBSYSTEllS, at <br />the most general levels, to CLASSES, SUBCLASSES, and DC>>IINANCE TYPES at the <br />lower levels. Additional descriptive information is given by utilizing <br />terms called OODIFIERS at the class level and. at lower levels in th" <br />classification hierarchy. <br /> <br />The classification hierarchical structure for the five SYSTE~S, eight <br />Sl.;llSYSTEHS, and seven CLASSES is illustrated in Figure ;'. Taxono:nic type <br />artificial keys are available to classify wetlands according to sysl:em, <br />subsystem, and class (Cowardin et al. 1979). <br /> <br />Systems. All wetlands can be easily grouped into one of the fIve basic <br />types of systems: marine, estuarine, riverine, lacustri.ne and palustrine, <br />based on hydrological, chemical, biological and geomorphologic <br />characteristics (See Figures 8-12). Riverine wetlands occur along the <br />streambanks and shores of streams or in other situations where water is <br />primarily restricted to a stream channel. Lacustrine wetlands are <br />associated with the littoral zone of lakes, while palustrine wetlands are <br />nontidal wetlands that are not associated with stream channels or lclke <br />margins. Palustrine wetlands include a wide variety of wetlands tlu't some <br />workers have categorized according to nutrient: content and source of <br />inflowing water (Whigham and Bayley 1978). <br /> <br />Subsystems. Systems are further subdivided into more specific <br />categories called subsystems according to trsditional hydrological <br />