My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00215
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:22:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:09:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
338
County
Arapahoe
Community
Sheridan
Title
CWCB Review Report - FIS - Arapahoe County, Colorado, and Incorporated Areas, Volumes I - III: Sheridan
Date
4/1/1989
Designation Date
3/1/1993
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Coloradc Water Conservation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />TO: Bill McDonald, Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />I have reviewed the request for a variance from rule(s) <br />submitted by <br />of the <br /> <br />dated <br /> <br />, and received by the board on <br />, and have determined that: <br /> <br />1. The following affected communities should be notified by the <br />applicant in writing: <br /> <br />2. The estimated changes in water surface elevation, floodplain area, <br />or flood velocities appear to be (if applicable): <br /> <br />significant <br /> <br />insignificant <br /> <br />3. Approximately <br />potentially be negatively <br />(i f applicable) <br /> <br />people in , structures could <br />affected by approval of the variance <br /> <br />4. The evidence submitted in accordance with the rule is <br /> <br />sufficient <br />for the board to make a decision. <br /> <br />insufficient <br /> <br />Therefore, I recommend that the request for a variance be <br /> <br />presented to the board for consideration. <br /> <br />returned to the requestor with deficiencies noted. <br /> <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.