Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. ' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />",' <br /> <br />Agency to the Department of Water Resources during the months of <br />July through September in 1987 and 1988. The Board approved the <br />1987 transaction as a temporary change and authorized the 1988 <br />transfer in the form of a trial transfer. In both years, the <br />Department purchased water from Yuba.County, which released the <br />water into the Yuba River where it flowed to the Delta. The <br />purpose of the transfers was'to allow the Department to satisfy <br />its obligations to maintain water quality in the Delta, while <br />retaining water in Lake Oroville on the Feather River for future <br />consumptive and instream demands. In 1987, the Board approved a <br />transfer of 83,100 acre feet at 935 cfs. In 1988, it authorized <br />the transfer of 110,000 acre feet at 500 to 600 cfs. <br /> <br />At the time of this writing, the Board also has pending <br />before it two proposed transfers for which environmental impact <br />reports are being prepared. One involves a possible ten year <br />transfer of an as yet unspecified quantity of water from the East <br />Bay Municipal utility District to the Contra Costa Water <br />District, The other involves a proposed transfer of State Water <br />Project water from the Devil's Den Water District to the castaic <br />Lake Water Agency. <br /> <br />Except for several temporary transfers that occurred during <br />the 1976-1977 drought, we have not been able to document any <br />transfers considered by the Board between 1975 and 1980. Indeed, <br />we have been advised by several members of the Board's staff that <br />there were no transfer applications filed during this period. <br /> <br />B. other Transfer Activitv <br /> <br />In addition to these transfers that have come before the <br />State Water Resources Control Board, we have surveyed all <br />contractors for water supplied by the State Water Project to <br />determine whether there have been transfers of state project <br />water between contractors and to assess the level of transfer <br />activity within each contracting agency. <br /> <br />Two contractors, the Coachel1a Valley Water District and the <br />Desert Water Agency, have entered into long-term agreements with <br />the Metropolitan Water District to exchange their SWP <br />entitlements for an equal quantity of MWD's entitlement from the <br />Colorado River. These contracts run until 2035. The Coachella <br />exchange involves 61,000 afa; the Desert exchange will reach <br />38,100 afa from 1990 through 2035. Both Coachella and Desert use <br />the replacement Colorado River water for groundwater recharge. <br /> <br />Apart from these two exchanges, there have been no transfers <br />of state project water between state contractors. The proposed <br />transfer from the Devil's Den Water District to the Castaic Lake <br />Water Agency was mentioned above. In addition, the Berrenda Mesa <br />Water District, which receives state project water from the Kern <br />County Water Agency, has been attempting to sell 50,000 afa of <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />