Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...' <br />j <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />& 0\,~~~ <br />d!:r- : od'Lf'B8 <br />in Utah COLORADO WATER <br />CONSERVATION <br />BOARD <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SUIIIIIUlry of Vater Right Transfers <br />September 27, 1988 <br /> <br />In general, the water right transfer process in Utah is well defined and <br />sufficientIy flexible to meet the changing needs of society. Efforts to study <br />the system over the past year indicate that there are no significant legal <br />hindrances to the transfer process, The limitations and inhibitions which do <br />exist are related to (1) failure ori the part of the applicant to understand the <br />transfer process, and (2) organizational and procedural aspects of the State <br />Engineer's office. A complete discussion of these factors will be included in <br />the final report. These factors do not prohibit valid water transfers from <br />occurring, but rather delay the overall transfer process to some extent. <br /> <br />Over the years, a variety of transfer applications have been filed with <br />the State Engineer. As a result of these applications a broad base of experience <br />and information has been generated. At the current time two main questions <br />regarding water rights remain vague. These include: <br /> <br />Out-of-state transfers - The Attorney General's office is of the impression <br />that the statute allows for out-of-state transfers on new <br />appropriations, but is uncertain as to whether transfers can be made <br />on existing rights. To date no applications or court actions have <br />been filed which would test the statute regarding out-of-state <br />transfers of existing rights. <br /> <br />Reserved ri~hts - The Ute Indian tribe in the eastern part of the State <br />has requested that it be allowed to market water off the reservation. <br />To date no quantified rights have been agreed to by the two parties <br />involved, and questions exist as to whom the key authority is which <br />actually regulates the water claimed by the Indian tribe. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Chan~e and Exchan~e Records <br /> <br />Information regarding 3331 change applications and 874 exchange <br />applications was obtained from the State Engineer's office which covers the <br />period from 1980-1987. These records were obtained through a combination of <br />available computer records and additional files available for public inspection. <br />It was assumed for this analysis that these records accurately portray the trends <br />and directions of -water transfers within the State of Utah during the study <br />-period. <br /> <br />Chan~e Applications <br /> <br />Number of applications filed <br />The number of change applications filed per year does not appear to be <br />following any particular trend over the study period. The total number of <br />applications filed has varied from a low of 333 in 1984 to a high of 466 filed <br />in 1983. Figure 1 is a graphical portrayal of the total number of change <br />applications filed statewide. Sl% of the change applications have been filed on <br />water in the southwestern quarter of the State. This region supports 6% of the <br />State's population according to state population statistics of 1987. Table 1 <br />lists the activity of change applications within the 46 individual areas of the <br />state in terms of the number of applications filed during the study period. <br />