Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i 't <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,. <br />, <br /> <br />The report of the State Board of Equalization, prepared by the <br />Division of Property Taxation, was used as the base document by the <br />Legislative Council in developing the recommendations that follow. <br />The data in this report need not be repeated except to indicate the <br />parameters of the estimated additional cost of six alternative <br />reappraisals and physical inspection cycles: <br /> <br />Physical Frequency Estimated <br />Inspection of Increased <br />Cycle Appraisals Cost <br />4 Years Annua 1 $16,726,981 <br /> Biennial 8,970,182 <br />10 Years Annual $13,169,835 <br /> Biennial 3,353,356 <br />20 Years Annu a 1 $12,220,397 <br /> Biennial 2,301,301 <br /> <br />The projected cost increases represent additional personnel <br />requirements only. Additional expenditures for increased office space <br />needs, upgrading of computers, increased printing and mailing costs <br />for annual assessments, and training costs were not included. <br />Personnel costs represent approximately three-fourths of the <br />expenditures of assessors' offices in most counties. <br /> <br />Legislative Council Recommendations <br /> <br />(1) In view of the cost projections for annual assessments, it <br />is recommended that the state retain the biennial assessment schedule <br />for years immediately beyond 1991. Great improvements have been made <br />in Colorado's assessment practices, but some counties are still <br />struggling under the present reassessment cycle. Last year's <br />statewide audit of one percent of all assessments in each county <br />reported that 23 counties were out of compliance in at least one <br />classification of property. Retaining the two-year reappraisal cycle <br />beyond 1991 will give counties that are not fully up-to-date a chance <br />to upgrade their assessors' offices without having to spend all of <br />their possible revenue increases for this purpose. The state, <br />however, should eventually adopt an annual reappraisal schedule and <br />counties should be prepared to meet this goal. <br /> <br />(2) The Legislative Council recommends that each county <br />determine for itself the physical inspection schedule that is <br />appropriate for its unique characteristics. A state mandate of <br />physical inspections every 4, 10, or 20 years could result in some <br />properties being inspected more frequently than necessary, others not <br />often enough. In several counties, the building permit system should <br />provide adequate information for determining the upgraded value of <br />various properties. In other areas, a physical inspection should be <br /> <br />-2- <br />