Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Summary of Cost Findings in Report <br /> <br />Two sets <br />alternatives <br />inspect ions: <br /> <br />of assumptions were made in the report resulting in six <br />for the frequency of appraisals and of physical <br /> <br />Frequency <br />of <br />Appraisals <br /> <br />Annual <br />Biennial <br /> <br />Frequency of <br />Physical <br />Inspections <br /> <br />4 Years <br />10 Years <br />20 Years <br /> <br />All alternatives are more costly than the present budgets of the <br />offices of county assessors. The projected cost increases are as <br />fo llows: <br /> <br />Physical Frequency Estimated <br />Inspection of Increased <br /> Cycle Appraisals Cost <br />4 Years Annual $16,726,9B1 <br /> Biennial 8,970,182 <br />10 Years Annual $13,169,835 <br /> Biennial 3,353,356 <br />20 Years Annua 1 $12,220,397 <br /> Biennial 2,301,301 <br /> <br />In terms of the number of counties needing more resources, the <br />OPT estimates the following: <br /> <br />1 year assessments; 4 year inspections: <br />-- all counties need assistance <br /> <br />1 year assessments; 10 year inspections: <br />-- 60 counties need assistance; 3 do not <br /> <br />1 year assessments; 20 year inspections: <br />-- 59 counties need assistance; 4 do not <br /> <br />2 year assessments; 4 year inspections: <br />-- 57 counties need assistance; 6 do not <br /> <br />2 year assessments; 10 year inspections: <br />-- 42 counties need assistance; 21 do not <br /> <br />2 year assessments; 20 year inspections: <br />-- 34 counties need assistance; 29 do not <br /> <br />-2- <br />