Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Castle Creek. Gaging station records are available for the USGS gaging station Castle Creek <br />Above Aspen, Co. (station no. 09074800) for a period of 25 years from 1970 to 1994. Frequency <br />analysis of this data yields an estimated l00-year discharge of 620 cfs at the gaging site which <br />has a drainage area of 32.2 sq mi. The CWCB regional regression equation for the Upper <br />Colorado River Subregion (Equation 1) yields a computed loo-year discharge for the gaging site <br />of 982 cfs. This value is substantially higher than the frequency analysis result for the same site. <br />Gage data also exists for a location farther downstream for the period 1913-1919. The seven <br />years of available data was judged too short a time period though to yield meaningful results and <br />no frequency analysis was carried out for this site. <br /> <br />Regional regression equations are based on limited data and, by definition, are developed to <br />cover a broad area. Because of these facts, there can be substantial error in computed flows. <br />Documentation available for the CWCB regional regression equations does not include <br />information on standard estimates of error. Gage data is available for a significant time period <br />for Castle Creek and is site specific. Based on this, it is recommended that the results of the <br />frequency analysis be used to estimate l00-year discharge rates rather than regional regression <br />equations. Frequency analysis results for the USGS gaging station on Castle Creek may be <br />extended to other locations on the creek using the following equation from the publication <br />. Manual for Estimating Flood Characteristics of Natural Flow Streams in Colorado (CWCB, <br />1976): <br /> <br />Qungaged = Qgaged(Aungag..,/ Agaged)o.79 <br /> <br />Equation 2 <br /> <br />Qungaged = Discharge at ungaged location (cfs) <br />Qgaged = Discharge at gaged location (cfs) <br />Aungaged = Drainage area at ungaged location (cfs) <br />Agaged = Drainage area at gaged location (cfs) <br />Equation applicable for ungaged sites where drainage area ratio lies between 0.5 and 2.0 <br /> <br />Note that Equation 2 is applicable only for ungaged sites where the drainage area is within a <br />factor of two of the drainage area at the gaged site. <br /> <br />Hunter Creek. Gage records of significant length exist for two locations on Hunter Creek. The <br />USGS gaging station, Hunter Creek Above Midway Creek, Near Aspen Co. (station no. <br />09073700) has 16 years of data collected between 1965 and 1980. A second USGS gaging <br />station, Hunter Creek Near Aspen, Co. is located further downstream and has 36 years of <br />recorded data collected between 1950 and 1999. Frequency analyses have been carried out for <br />these two sites and compared to the results of regional regression analysis. A comparison of <br />these results is provided in Table 3. At the more upstream gaging site, gage records indicate a <br />substantially higher discharge than regression analysis. At the downstream location, the results <br />of the two analyses are very similar. <br /> <br />Because the gaging station data is of significant length, is site specific and indicates higher <br />discharge rates than the CWCB regional regression equation, it is recommended that the results <br /> <br />5 <br />