Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />i. <br />!. <br />;. <br />I. <br />'. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />:. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />areas were affected by the flood but agricultural lands and numerous roads and bridges were <br />damaged. <br /> <br />Near Aspen, the flood of June-July 1917 is considered the most severe when a peak discharge of <br />3,170 cfs was recorded on the Roaring Fork River. The highest recorded peak flow on the <br />Crystal River above its confluence with Avalanche Creek is 3,980 cfs, which occurred in 1957. <br />No damage estimates are presented in the PIS for either of these events. <br /> <br />Previous Studies <br />The September 30, 1988 PIS is a revision of the original Pitkin County PIS which was published <br />on June 4, 1987 and was previously designated by the CWCB. The September 1988 revision <br />was carried out to incorporate approximate floodplain mapping information for Brush Creek <br />within the Town of Snowmass Village. This Hydrology Addendum provides hydrology <br />information not only for Brush Creek but for all approximately mapped streams in the 1988 PIS. <br /> <br />Community Resuonse to the CWCB Desilmation and Auuroval Process <br />Letters from the CWCB were transmitted to Pitkin County and the incorporated areas of <br />Snowmass Village and Aspen providing notification of the Board's proposed action for <br />designation and approval of the revised Pitkin County and Incorporated Areas PIS. The County <br />was receptive to the Board's proposed designation action and provided verbal approval for the <br />designation in a phone conversation on March 23, 2001. Both the Town of Snowmass Village <br />and the City of Aspen were also contacted by phone and were receptive to the Board's proposed <br />designation. <br /> <br />3 <br />