Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NATIONAL FLOOD PROGRAMS IN REVIEW-2000 <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The flood loss reduction policies of the United States were initially crafted a century ago in <br />recognition of a federal role in flood protection, and were modified after devastating floods in the <br />1920s and 1930s, The policy at that time was founded on a popular belief in hwnan ability to control <br />nature through technological advances and through the strength of the federal government. In the late <br />1950s and 1960s it was recognized that federal programs could not possibly control all floods, and <br />that management of both floodprone lands-and hwnan occupancy of them-was necessary. <br /> <br />Although it was not broadly embraced at the time, the conceptual framework of these policy changes <br />emanated from Gilbert F. White's dissertation, Human Adjustment to Floods, published in 1945, This <br />ground-breaking work was the first to suggest a multi-pronged strategy for the management of flood <br />losses, Several states were implementing floodplain management initiatives at the time, but the first <br />federal application was made by the Tennessee Valley Authority through the work of James Goddard <br />in the 1950s. Between the academic foundation laid by White and the applications pursued by <br />Goddard and a handful of floodplain management practitioners, lessons were leamed that allowed for <br />the crafting of a new means of managing flood losses, <br /> <br />During the 1950s and early 1960s, however, mainstream federal policy continued to promote a strong <br />federal lead in the control of floods along with increased post-disaster benefits, such that there was <br />very little incentive for local or state governments to worry about managing flood hazards, <br /> <br />With the establishment of the National Flood Insurance Program in 1968, the relationship between <br />the federal government and state and local governments was altered, From that point forward it was <br />recognized that escalating disaster costs must be controlled and that flood protection was not simply <br />the responsibility of the federal government. Through flood insurance, those at risk began to bear a <br />larger share of the costs associated with flooding, The National Flood Insurance Program also served <br />as a mechanism to bring the responsibility for floodplain management to the states and communities <br />of the nation, <br /> <br />From the late 1960s to the early 1990s, modest advancements in a balanced floodplain management <br />strategy were made. These included reforms to the National Flood Insurance Program that included <br />the mandatory purchase of insurance provisions (this led to most communities' adopting floodplain <br />management standards), revisions to federal cost-sharing that placed more funding responsibility on <br />project sponsors, and the establishment of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program in the Federal <br />Emergency Management Agency. In addition to these visible policy changes was the development <br />of the Unified National Program for Floodplain Management, initiated by the Water Resources <br />Council and later transferred to a Federal Interagency Task Force on Floodplain Management, chaired <br />by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, The work ofthe Water Resources Council and Task <br />Force led to the broadening of floodplain management tools and concepts to include such techniques <br />as floodproofing, the concept that floodplain management has a dual purpose-loss reduction and <br />the management of natural and beneficial floodplain functions-and promotion of multi-objective <br />planning strategies. <br /> <br />Association of State Floodplain Managers <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br />National Flood Programs in Review 2000 <br />