My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00116
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:22:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:03:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
67
County
Larimer
Community
Unincorporated Larimer County
Stream Name
Big Thompson River and Tributaries
Title
Special Floodplain Information Report - Volume I, Big Thompson River and Tributaries, Larimer County, Colorado
Date
12/1/1976
Designation Date
1/1/1977
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Channel <br />Overbank <br /> <br />.035 to .045 <br />.050 to .600 <br /> <br />.070 <br />.070 <br /> <br />depths greater than two to three feet would be common in the <br />overbank areas. overbank velocities would generally range <br />between three to eight feet per second. In the main channel, <br />typical flood depths would be ~ eigttt to ten feet while average <br />velocities would range between ten and fourteen feet per second. <br /> <br />FLOOD <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />PLAIN ROUGHNESS VALUES <br /> <br />Typical Range <br /> <br />Maximum <br /> <br />At the lower study limit, the flood levels reported in the <br />December, 1971, FlOOd Plain Information for the Big Thompson at <br />Loveland, Colorado, were used as the basis for this study <br />(Ref. 11). <br /> <br />A summary of the hydraulic computations completed for ~h~ <br />study is available for review at the offices of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />The major bridges crossing the river and tributaries were <br />considered in the hydraulic analysis.' Smaller culverts and <br />temporary river crossing facilities installed after the July 31, <br />1976 flood were not considered in the hydraulic analysis, Bridge <br />blockage due to debris catching at each structure and to bridge <br />skew across the flood plain was considered. The maximum blockage <br />of the total bridge flow area was limited to 30 percent. <br /> <br />, <br />i <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />FLOOOWAY <br /> <br />Super elevations, the rise in water surface elevation <br />due to high velocity flows around curves, WnS ~nnlY7-pd ann <br />included in the laO-year flood profile. Similarly, the damming <br />and blockage effects of side tributary inflow was also included <br />in the lOO-year flood profile. <br /> <br />Encroachment into the natural flood plain with fill <br />material, buildings, roads and bridges, reduces the flood-carrying <br />capacity of the stream and increases flood heights, velocities <br />and flood hazards in areas upstream and downstream from the <br />location of the encroachment itself. One aspect of flood plain <br />management inVOlves balancing the assets or benefits of flood <br />plain development against the liabilities of increased ha~ards <br />and deferred public and private costs. The concept of a floadway <br />is used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect <br />of flood plain management. Under the floadway concept, the area <br />of the 100-year flood plain is divided into a floadway ~one and <br />a floodway fringe or low hazard zone. The floodway zone includes <br />the main channel plus adjacent flood plain areas, which must be <br />kept free of encroachment in order that the lOa-year flood, <br />at a minimum, be carried without increasing potential hazards <br />by increasing flood depths and velocities. <br /> <br />A tabulation of the computed flood elevations along each <br />stream is provided in Tables 6-12. The flood plain limits and <br />flood profiles are shown on the Flooded Areas maps and profile <br />charts included in Volume II. <br /> <br />The flocdway prepared for this study and delineated on <br />the Flooded Areas maps in Volume II meets the minimum criteria <br />for the floodway ~one as defined in the Model Flood Plain <br /> <br />The hydraulic study indicated that most of the canyon <br />bottom would be inundated during a laO-year flood event. Flood <br /> <br />-14- <br /> <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.