Laserfiche WebLink
<br />282 <br /> (mm) <br /> 250 <br /> 200 <br />~ <br />,g <br />. 150 <br />. <br />. <br />.c <br />;; <br />~ 100 <br />c <br />c <br />.. <br /> <br />J. lAVABRE ET AL. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF A MEDITERRANEAN BASIN <br /> <br />283 <br /> <br />(mm) AIUBAIID BASIN MONTHLY MEDIANS (1967.89) <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br /> <br />170 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />136 <br /> <br />. Rainfall (mm) <br />!fa Runoff (mm) <br /> <br />102 <br /> <br /> <br />68 <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Aug. Sept Oct. Nov. Dee. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July <br />Fig. 5. Median monthly precipitation and runoff during the reference periD<! (J9~7-1989). <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />contributions to reinitiate the permanent flow regime (to refill the initial <br />hydrological deficit (DE)). <br />T?e initi~l deficit, which is related to the necessary soil recharge, has been <br />studIed dUrIng the reference period and linked to the duration of the non. <br />permanent flow period (DUR is the number of days without permanent fiow <br />from the start of the hydrological year). <br />The regression equation <br /> <br />DE (mm) = 1.07 DUR (number of days) + 166 (3) <br /> <br />has been established. <br />This equation provides a good estimate of DE (R = 0.915; u". = 19 mm). <br />The fixed term (l66mm) IS related to the storage capacity and the variable <br />ter~ represents the influence of the delay in reaching the pennanent flow <br />regIme; the later the permanent flow is attained, the higher the deficit to be. <br />refilled is, since it implies- that the intermediate precipitations are in fact lost <br />by evapotranspiration (very high during this period, see Table 5). <br />For this year, despite some floods at the start of October, the flow was not <br />permanent until 12 October. Thus eqn. (3) predicts an initial deficit of242mm <br />IOstead of the 165mm of accumulated rainfall recorded until this date <br />Again, a complementary estimate leads us to conclude that there ~as a <br />reduction of the losses in 1990. In this case the difference between predicted <br />and observed deficit is about 77 mm (32% of reduction), and again this <br />dIfference c~nnot be explained by the normal hazard fluctuations (it is more <br />than .t~ree times greater than the arcs of the equation). Note, however, that this <br />deficit IS only related to the initial losses, and that this figure of 77 mm is only <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />800 1000 1200 (mm) <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />600 <br /> <br />Fig. 4. Relation between annual base flow and tOla) flow for the Rimbaud basin (1967-1990). <br /> <br />Total annual flow <br /> <br />is 28.4%. This value is inside the range of ratios observed during the refer~ <br />ence period (between 7% in 1969 and 36% in 1989). When we compare <br />total annual base flowlo total runoff (see Fig. 4) we should point out that the <br />1990 value is slightly higher than the upper envelope of the reference period <br />values. <br />Therefore, we cannot make conclusions about an anomaly and we will <br />suppose that the increase in AR is produced on both components. <br /> <br />Monthly analysis <br /> <br />The median values of monthly precipitation and runoff for the reference <br />period are shown in Fig. 5 (median values are usually used owing to the <br />asymmetry of the runoff). The precipitation distribution shows the classical <br />representation of the Mediterranean climate: a dry period during the summer <br />months but a rainy winter and spring. As for the runoff, it should be noted <br />that: <br />(I) The precipitation distribution shows good accordance with the pluvio- <br />metry from January urhil the summer; <br />(2) the flow is not permanent and disappears during the dry period; <br />(3) at the start of the hydrological year, the basin needs high rainfall <br /> <br />