Laserfiche WebLink
<br />292 <br /> <br />J. LAVABRE ET AL. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF A MEOITERRANEAN BASIN <br /> <br />FLOOD ON DECEMBER THE 9th 1990 <br /> <br />293 <br /> <br /> <br />TABLE 8 <br /> <br />Flood events in 1990 <br /> <br />250 <br /> <br />3S0 <br /> <br />450 <br /> <br />5S0 <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />Peak Dow <br />(m)s-l) <br /> <br />Total water yield <br />(mm) <br /> <br />Total rainfall <br />(mm) <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> I h 12h I h 12h <br />) October 1990 2.0 2.3 2.6 26 26 <br />3 October 1990 6.2 1.9 2.2 15 23 <br />25 November 1990 6.0 3.4 15.7 17 65 <br />9 December 1990 8.0 11.8 32.0 28 78 <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />~ 8 <br /> <br />ci <br /> <br />.. 12 <br />" <br />.. <br />a: <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />We have used a 23 year period of data before the fire as a reference period <br />providing the normal hydrological behaviour of a small Mediterranean basin <br />(1.4km'). <br />Some linear regressions and a lumped conceptual hydrological model were <br />calibrated in this reference period. They were used to assess what the response <br />of the basin would have been if the fire had not taken place. The comparison <br />between these results and the data observed have served to point out the <br />changes in hydrological behaviour of the basin due to the consequences of fire. <br />Two main aspects were checked: (1) the changes on the annual runoff yield <br />and (2) the changes in the flood regime. <br />(I) As for the annual runoff, we used five independent methods, with <br />different time steps, of assessing the increment produced after the fire. Table <br />10 shows these evaluations. <br />To summarise, the increment can be evaluated to be approximately <br />between 25 and 30% of supplementary runoff(aboutI30mm), which cannot <br />be explained either by hazard fluctuations or by climate fluctuations. <br />We suggest that this change is due to the consequences of the fire, and <br /> <br />9000 <br /> <br />6750 <br /> <br />~ <br />;; 4500 <br />g <br />, <br />a: <br /> <br />2250 <br /> <br />o <br />2S0 <br /> <br />350 <br /> <br />450 <br /> <br />550 650 <br />Time (minutes) <br /> <br />Fig. 9. Rimbaud flood event on 9 December 1990 at a I min time step. <br /> <br />particularly to the destruction of the vegetation cover. Using the lumped <br />conceptual model, we tested if a simple change in the evapotranspiration <br />amounts can lead to a better reproduction of the observed monthly runoff. <br />The results showed that the reduction of losses is hydrologically equivalent to <br />applying the model in a new environment where the potential evapotranspira- <br />tion is reduced by 50% (without changing either the model conceptualisation <br />or the previously calibrated parameters). <br />It shows that the main hydrological change induced by the fire, at least at <br /> <br />TABLE 9 <br /> <br />Flood events in the reference period (1967-1989) <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />Peak flow <br />(mls-I) <br /> <br />I h <br />rainfall (mm) <br /> <br />12h <br />rainfall (mm) <br /> <br />September 1968 <br />October 1973 <br />April 1976 <br />October 1987 <br /> <br />i 13.7 <br />9.1 <br />4.8 <br />4.8 <br /> <br />158 <br />150 <br />t20 <br />100 <br /> <br />89 <br />58 <br />18 <br />4t <br /> <br />OSO <br /> <br />750 <br /> <br />8S0 <br /> <br /> <br />750 <br /> <br />850 <br /> <br />