My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00079
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:50:34 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Title
Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency Bulletin 17
Date
3/1/1976
Prepared By
USWRC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />III distribution because the logarithm of zero is minus infinity. The <br />method of combining probabilities recommended for determining frequency <br />curves for records with zero flood years is described in Appendix 5. <br />6. Mixed Population--Flooding in some watersheds is created by <br />different types of events. This results in flood frequency curves with <br />abnormally large skew coefficients reflected by abnormal slope changes <br />when plotted on logarithmic normal probability paper. In some situations <br />the frequency curve of annual events can best be described by computing <br />separate curves for each type of event. The curves are then combined. <br />Two examples of combinations of different types of flood-producing <br />events include rain with snowmelt and intense tropical storms with <br />general cyclonic storms. Hydrologic factors and relationships operating <br />during general winter rain floods are usually quite different from those <br />operating during spring snowmelt floods or during local summer cloudburst <br />floods. One example of mixed population is in the Sierra Nevada region <br />of California. Frequency studies there have been made separately for <br />I <br />rain floods which occur principally during the months of November through <br />March, and for snowmelt floods, which occur during the months of April <br />through July. Peak flows were segregated by cause--those predominately <br />caused by snowmelt and those predominately caused by rain. Another <br />example is along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, where in some instances <br />floods from hurricane and nonhurricane events have been separated, <br />thereby improving frequency estimates. <br />When it can be shown that there are two or more distinct and generally <br />independent causes of floods it may be more reliable to segregate the <br />flood data by cause, analyze each set separately, and then to combine <br />the data sets using procedures such as described in (11). Separation by <br />calendar periods in lieu of separation by events is not considered <br />hydrologically reasonable unless the events in the separate periods are <br />clearly caused by different hydrometerologic conditions. The fitting <br />procedures of this guide can be used to fit each flood series separately, <br />with the exception that generalized skew coefficients cannot be used <br />unless developed for the specific type events being examined. <br />If the flood events that are believed to comprise two or more <br />populations cannot be identified and separated by an objective and <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.