My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00079
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:50:34 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Title
Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency Bulletin 17
Date
3/1/1976
Prepared By
USWRC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />information in published or unpublished form is available from other <br />sources. <br />A statistical analysis of these data is the primary basis for the <br />determination of the flow frequency curve for each station. <br /> <br />B. Historic Data <br />At many locations, particularly where man has occupied the flood <br />plain for an extended period, there is information about major floods <br />which occurred either before or after the period of systematic data <br />collection. This information can often be used to make estimates of <br />peak discharge. It also often defines an extended period during which <br />the largest floods, either recorded or historic, are known. The USGS <br />includes some historic flood information in its published reports and <br />computer files. Additional information can sometimes be obtained from <br />the files of other agencies or extracted from newspaper files or by <br />intensive inquiry and investigation near the site for which the flood <br />frequency information is needed. <br />Historic flood information should be obtained and documented <br />whenever possible, particularly where the systematic record is relatively <br />short. Use of historic data assures that estimates fit community experi- <br />ence and improves the frequency determinations. <br /> <br />C. Comparison With Similar Watersheds <br />Comparisons between computed frequency curves and maximum flood <br />data of the watershed being investigated and those in a hydrologically <br />similar region are useful for identification of unusual events and for <br />testing the reasonableness of flood flow frequency determinations. <br />Studies have been made and published [e.g., (1), (2), (3), (4)]* which <br />permit comparing flood frequency estimates at a site with generalized <br />estimates for a homogeneous region. Comparisons with information at <br />stations in the immediate region should be made, particularly at gaging <br />stations upstream and downstream, to promote regional consistency and <br />help prevent gross errors. <br /> <br />*Numbers in parentheses refer to numbered references in Appendix 1. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.