Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />1-. <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1,- <br />I'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The MUller report hydraulic evaluations indicated that a <br />cleared river system could pass the 100-year flood at a profile <br />approximately 2-feet lower than the comparable flood profile <br />with the river choked with vegetation and large accumulations <br />of river sediment. Clearing the river channel on a regular <br />basis would provide significant economic benefits to the <br />community in terms of maintaining the levee system capacity. <br />Improvements to the levee system were identified that, if <br />implemented, would upgrade the integri ty and capacity of the <br />system to federal standards and criteria. Improvements <br />included raising and widening the levees. providing riprap <br />armor protection, reducing seepage under and through the <br />levees, providing access control along the top of the levees <br />and constructing new tieback levees northwest of the City for <br />right and left bank levee systems. <br /> <br />Initial estimates of construction costs for the conceptual <br />improvements totaled approximately $6.4 million, including <br />construction, contingencies and engineering. Based upon the <br />cost estimates of flood damages and constructing the <br />improvements, as Qptlined in the report, the improvements were <br />rated economically justifiable as represented by an approximate <br />benefit/cost ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3. <br /> <br />The Muller Engineering report <br />the potential flood losses in <br />inundation of the community. <br />to determine an es t ima te of <br />flood risk. <br /> <br />contained an economic analysis of <br />the area resulting from the flood <br />The purpose of this analysis was <br />the cost of the average annual <br /> <br />The majority of the damages would occur to private and pUblic <br />properties once the capacity of the current system was <br />exceeded, at about the 25-year flood event. Figure 1 shows the <br />damage curve of estimated flood losses for each flood frequency. <br /> <br />Also shown on Figure 1 and Table 2 are the damage curve and <br />annual risk to the community with an improved levees system <br />capable of passing the 100-year flood through the community, as <br />well as part of the 500-year flood. The annual flood risk <br />after improvements would be $63,315. <br /> <br />The report indicated that the improved levee system could <br />provide a reduction in the annual risk and thus a benefit to <br />the Community of approximately $984,385. The report also <br />stated that with funding avai lable, first priority and <br />immediate action should be taken to upgrade the East Alamosa <br />levee between U.S. 160 and the railroad. <br /> <br />-12- <br />