Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. . <br />,. <br />.L <br />--. <br /> <br />.' <br />. <br />- <br />.' <br /> <br />. "- <br />. , <br />'.:'. <br />'"' ; <br /> <br />8 THE ARKANSAS RIVER FLOOD OF JUNE 3-5, 1921. <br /> <br />flood while trying to rench higher ground, cnrs were overturned and <br />several lives were lost (PI. II, B). The 2,000 cars in the ;ards <br />during the flood suffered enormous damage; many were floated away <br />and overturned or crushed by the impact or pressure of debris. <br />Some cars were floated grcat distances and were never recovered.' <br />The total property loss in the city was estimated ~t $10,000,000. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />PROGRESS OF FLOOD CREST THROUGH ARKANSAS <br />V ALLEY. <br /> <br />The streams that enter Arkansas Ri"l"er between Canon City and <br />4e mouth of Chico Creek, 16 miles below Pueblo, were the source <br />of the flood, and'in that section of the river the flood crest increased <br />rapidly as it proceeded downstream. Below the mouth of Chico <br />Creek the river received practically noildditional flood discharges. <br />The approximate time of the flood crest at several points, as ob- <br />tained from local observers, and the maximum discharge at points <br />where it was measured are given in the following table. As the <br />crest flattened out, it became less sharply defined, and the exact time <br />of its arrival at different points was more difficult to determine. <br /> <br />..~ <br /> <br />ProfJre.... of flood cr6llt throllol. Arkanao~ Valley. <br /> <br /> Distance .\pproxlmate tlm. oi creSt. Rate 01 Crest Duration <br />Point or observation. bet,,-ceo progress. flow. of crest <br /> poInts.- o.ow. <br /> -Ank, p" <br /> Anlt,. It,m,. .'I"c.fl. <br />Canon City. ................... -.......~. R p. m. June 3................ ""Ojr,:n" 3,1.J0 <br />Florence._ ..... ........ _. ....0. 8.30 p. m.lullo 3.............. 9,(1QI) <br />Pueblo.. .................. .... a.; 'Midnight. J11no 3.............. 10.0 l03,tXXt G mln.. <br /> utes. <br />~fanzanola._. ..... .... ......... ii2 !J.30 ft. m.ll1n!') .$.......4...... 5.5 .4........ <br />Rocky Fordh................. 10 11.::UIl.m. Jllno "..4.......... 5.0 .......... <br />La Junta. ..................... 13 :l a. m. Juno ~................ 3.7 200,.0(1) 43 min. <br /> uleo. <br />Fort Lyon..................... 28 lip. m. June 4............... 3.5 .......4.. <br />Head of AmltrcanaJ........... 23 ...~) 11. m. Iune 5.......4...... 4.2 110,000 31 houn. <br />Lamllr......................... 7 ;.30 a. m. Iune 5 .............4. 2.1 .......... <br />Holly.......................... 30 8.30 p. m. June 8"'............ 2.3 120,000 <br /> ;; '. . <br /> <br />II ~reasured along' ri'\"er. <br /> <br />The table shows that the rate of progress of the flood crest de- <br />creased as it traveled down the river. Above Pueblo the decrease <br />was due chiefly to the decreased slope of the river, but this could not <br />have had much effect in the lower part of the valley, as the mean <br />slope decreases only from 8.3 feet to the mile between Pueblo and <br />La Junta to 7.5 feet to the mile between La Junta and the State line. <br />Belmv La .Junta the chief factor in retarding the progress of the <br /> <br />o' <br /> <br />.;. <br /> <br />~.;;..; <br /> <br />'; /'. ' Data on raUrond losses taken Cram R.II....y Age. June 17, 1921. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'1 <br />1 <br />