My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00051
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:29:43 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:00:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Pueblo
Title
The Arkansas River Flood of June 3-5, 1921
Date
2/5/1996
Prepared For
Pueblo County
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />9 <br />PREVIOUS Fl<bODS. <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />to 2 feet. This Is a worse flood than any that has occurred since the town <br />became II city. The water flows witha strong current through the streets, and <br />eyerythll)g is confusion. The fluoo covers the city from Union Avenue 011 the <br />sOllth'slde to Fourth Avenue on the, north side, an area of three-quarters of II <br />mile. <br /> <br />The issue of the ~ews on June 1 stated that on Second Street be- <br />tween Santa Fe Avenue and Main Street the water was 4 feet deep <br />over the floors of the bJlildings. Five lives were lost in Pueblo and <br />damage amounting to nearly $2,000,000 was done to property. <br />At its highest stage the. water was 3 feet deep in the Denver & Rio <br />Grande Railroad freight yard and kept that stage from 2 to 8.30 <br />a. m. May 31. , It receded slowly and by 6 a. m. June 1 had fallen <br />only 41 feet. The highest stage was about 7 feet less than that of <br />the flood of 1921. <br />Subsequent to the flood the city engineer, Mr. E. W. Hathaway, <br />measured the slope of the river and its flood cross section just west <br />of the city. He found the maximum discharge of the flood to be <br />39,100 second-feet, of which 24,200 second-feet had been carried by <br />the river channel and the remainder flowed through the city on both <br />sides of the river. Subsequently the river channel in Pueblo was <br />widened and the levees raised so that the improved channel would, <br />carry 40,000 second-feet. <br />In the Arkansas Valley above Pueblo the flood of 1894 reached a <br />higher stage than that of 1921, the high-water mark on the old <br />Denver & Rio Grande Railroad pump house at Florence being 2 feet <br />higheJ;. than that of June 3, 1921. The crest of the flood reached <br />Rocky Ford some time during May 31. Lamar rep.oried the flood <br />crest at noon June 2. The upper limit of the flood area was about <br />Hardscrabble Creek, which carried an unusual flood flow. Coal and <br />Chandler creeks were also very high.. <br />Heavy rains on June 5, 1894, extending from Canon City to <br />Pueblo, again raised the Arkansas until it reached a stage at Pueblo' <br />about 8 inches lower than that of May 31., The rainfall on June 5 <br />was 1.82 inches at Canon City and 0.64 inch 'at Pueblo. _, <br />The lower Arkansas Valley was visited by very severe floods dur- <br />ing 1904; but they did not reach the upper valley. Between Wichita <br />and Arkansas City the flood of July 9, 1904, was the severest known. <br />For ten days before that date the maximum discharge at Pueblo was <br />1,520 second-feet. On September 30, 1904, the severest flood known <br />occurred on Purgatoire Riyer. This flood caiuled a great amount <br />of damage on Arkansas River below the mouth of the Purgatoire," <br />but it did not affect the Arkansas Valley above the Purgatoire. The <br />maximum discharge at Pueblo for the week preceding September 30 <br />was 1,100 second-feet. <br /> <br />., <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />u. Meeker, n. J.. U. S. Ceo!. Survey 'Water-Supply Paper 147, pp. i65-168. 1905. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.