Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.1.2 Comparison with Flood Insurance study. A comparison <br />of the results'of the existing conditions water surface profiles calculated <br />for this study with a preliminary copy of the Flood Insurance Study showed <br />that all of the profiles except the 100-year were in good agreement. The <br />100-year water surface profile calculated for this s1:udy is approximately <br />one to two feet higher than for the lrlood Insurance Study. A11:hough the <br />Flood Insurance Study's HEC-2 model ~'las !Clot available for comparison of <br />model input and output, the difference in water surface profilE~s may be <br />explained by this study's assumption to have the 100-year discharge confined <br />to the channel through the bridges as "hown by historic data. <br /> <br />3.2 Existing Conditions Floodway. Once the exi"ting conditi.ons model <br />was finalized a 100-year floodway was computed. The initial floodway runs <br />were ran with the method four encroachmen1: option for HEC-2. This option <br />computes encroachment stations for the specified on" foot rise in water <br />surface with an equal loss of conve~'ancE~ on each overbank. Because of <br />irregularities in the cross sections and flood plain these encroachments <br />were then smoothed to provide a smooth conS3istent floodway outlinE! as shown <br />on Plates 3 and 4. Encroachment met;hod one was us"d to accomplish this <br />task. A floodway data table for the E~xis1:ing conditions is shown in Table <br />Three. <br /> <br />3.3 Proposed City Levee Option. In attachment 1, the City of Sterling <br />presented a possible levee alignment for flood mitigat:ion. This alignment <br />was then modeled in the HEC-2 existing conditions floCldway model. Whenever <br />the levee was located inside of the exi.sting conditions floodway t.h" method <br />one encroachment station was changed to meE~t the levee! station. The levee <br />floodway was then run to determine t.he \'later surface increase for this <br />option and is shown in Table Four. The levee encroachment into the floodway <br />caused water surface increases by as much as 0.9 feet above the standard 1.0 <br />foot floodway rise. This option may requi:r-e negotiat,ions for compensation <br />with land owners whose land would be susceptible to increa,sed flood <br />elevations. <br />A 100-year levee constructed for this option should be constructed at <br />least as high as the floodway water SUrfaCE! elevations in Table Four with an <br />additional three feet of freeboard. The additional freeboard should meet <br />FEMA criteria for levee adequacy and. allow a factor of safE~ty for the <br />design. <br /> <br />3.4 Channel Clearing Option. The city also requested hydraulic data for <br />possible clearing of the South Platte chann,.l. This was modeled by reducing <br />the existing conditions channel "n" values. Where the channel "n" value was <br />0.035, it was reduced to 0.030. When the channel "n" value was higher in <br />portions to reflect trees or shrubs it was reduced to an "n" value of 0.035 <br />to reflect the clearing measures. The ca.lculated water surface profiles <br />were then plotted against existing conditions water surface profiles and are <br />shown on Plate 2. Next a cleared floodway was run and the results shown in <br /> <br />6 <br />