Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for selected durations, 1871-1986--Continued <br /> <br />30-minute duration <br /> <br />I-hour duration <br /> <br />Month <br />and day <br /> <br />7-31 <br />5-29 <br /> <br />5-24 <br /> <br />9-08 <br />8-28 <br />6-18 <br /> <br />7-21 <br />7-24 <br />8-08 <br />7-30 <br />7-23 <br /> <br />7-12 <br />5-23 <br />8-17 <br />7-24 <br />8-01 <br /> <br />9-18 <br /> <br />Maximum ' <br />rainfall <br />(inches) <br /> <br />Month <br />and day <br /> <br />Maximum <br />rainfall <br />(inches) <br /> <br />1.16 <br />.52 <br />'.50 <br />'.35 <br />.96 <br /> <br />, .45 <br />'.35 <br />2.48 <br />.75 <br />.61 <br /> <br />.73 <br />.94 <br />.57 <br />.65 <br />.45 <br /> <br />1. 31 <br />1. 28 <br />1. 20 <br />.75 <br />3.64 <br /> <br />1.15 <br /> <br />2-hour duration <br /> <br />24-hour duration <br /> <br />Month <br />and day <br /> <br />7-31 <br />5-29 <br />'5_23 <br />, 10-05 <br />5-24 <br /> <br />'8_28 <br />'5_19 <br />9-08 <br />8-28 <br />7-14 <br /> <br />7-21 <br />7-24 <br />8-08 <br />7-30 <br />8-15 <br /> <br />8-12 <br />6-25 <br />8-17 <br />7-24 <br />8-01 <br /> <br />9-18 <br /> <br />Maximum <br />rainfall <br />(inches) <br /> <br />Month <br />and day <br /> <br />Maximum <br />rainfall <br />(inches) <br /> <br />1. 70 <br />1. 63 <br />1. 52 <br />.98 <br />1. 87 <br /> <br />.85 <br />.78 <br />3.42 <br />2.33 <br />1. 21 <br /> <br />1.08 <br />1. 67 <br />1.50 <br />1. 65 <br />1. 18 <br /> <br />1. 76 <br />1. 76 <br />1. 38 <br />1. 94 <br />6.06 <br /> <br />1.40 <br /> <br />missing data in the National Weather Service record for the years 1968-69 and <br />by Craig and Rank1 (1978). However, Craig and Rank1 (1978) did not determine <br />of interest. Instead, only the one to three storms each year that produced the <br />most intense 5-minute period of precipitation that occurred during a given year <br />was one of the one to three storms that produced the greatest amount of runoff <br />not ,completed as originally planned because there was no assurance that the most <br /> <br />0.91 <br />.46 <br />(') <br />(') <br />.88 <br /> <br />7-31 <br />5-29 <br />'7_25 <br />10-05 <br />5-24 <br /> <br />1. 39 <br />.53 <br />'.75 <br />'.70 <br />.96 <br /> <br />7-31 <br />4-13 <br />5-23 <br />6-11 <br />6-12 <br /> <br />(' ) <br />(' ) <br />2.00 <br />.73 <br />.42 <br /> <br />28_28 <br />25_19 <br />9-08 <br />8-28 <br />7-14 <br /> <br />'.45 <br />2.45 <br />2.68 <br />.75 <br />1. 01 <br /> <br />5-05 <br />5-19 <br />7-19 <br />6-08 <br />5-29 <br /> <br />.57 <br />.82 <br />.46 <br />.62 <br />.40 <br /> <br />7-21 <br />7-24 <br />8-08 <br />7-30 <br />7-23 <br /> <br />.73 <br />1. 13 <br />.72 <br />.65 <br />.54 <br /> <br />7-21 <br />7-25 <br />5-06 <br />11-20 <br />1-25 <br /> <br />.97 <br />.95 <br />1.14 <br />.55 <br />2.19 <br /> <br />8-12 <br />5-23 <br />8-17 <br />7-24 <br />8-01 <br /> <br />1.40 <br />1. 46 <br />1. 20 <br />.88 <br />4.69 <br /> <br />7-12 <br />6-24 <br />5-16 <br />4-19 <br />8-01 <br /> <br />.64 <br /> <br />9-18 <br /> <br />1.40 <br /> <br />9-18 <br /> <br />comparison purposes; however, it was not used in the anaylsis. <br /> <br />11 <br />