My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02646
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02646
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:18:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1998
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Issues - Articles Regarding Draining of Lake Powell
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone, (303) 866.3441 <br />fAJC 13031 866.4474 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />GovernOr <br /> <br />JilmesS.lochhead <br />Executive Director, DNR <br />Daries C.lile, RE. <br />Director, (WeB <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />FROM: Randy Seaholm i)~ <br /> <br />DATE: January 12,1998 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 29d, January 28-29, 1998, Board Meeting -- <br />Articles Regarding Draining of Lake Powell <br /> <br />INFORMATIONAL <br /> <br />As per the Board's request, attached are several articles addressing the proposal by the Sierra <br />Club and Glen Canyon Institute to drain Lake PowelL The storage in Lake Powell allows the <br />four Upper Colorado Basin States to develop their compact apportionment as needed, and <br />provides significant recreational value for boating and fishing. Without the storage benefits of <br />Lake Powell, the Upper Basin would need to collectively ensure that 7.5 MAF arrives annually at <br />Lee Ferry and also find other ways to pay for water projects developed under CRSP. <br /> <br />This has recently been a popular topic for the media. At some point, we likely need to take a <br />position to protect the benefits of Lake Powell and publicly recognize the consequences to the <br />Upper Basin States without its storage benefits. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.