My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02638
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:18:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/10/1998
Description
CF Section - Requests for Approval on Loans for New Projects - State of Colorado Participation in the GASP Regulation Project
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />oZ~. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />To: Board Members of Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />From: Bart Woodward, President GASP. <br /> <br />Date: March 6, 1998 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />State of Colorado participation in the GASP reregulation project. <br /> <br />Included in this information packed is a small booklet entitled "South Platte River <br />Compact - Colorado Proceedings". This booklet is a reproduction of a State Publication <br />printed originally around 1925 and includes the compact and additional information <br />concerning the Compact. <br /> <br />Also included is a copy ofCRS 37.81.101-104 better know as the export statute. <br /> <br />The information included on the four additional sheets in this packet illustrate the potential <br />problems that may be caused by the delivery of 10,000 acre feet of water across the State <br />line. The information on the spread sheets is an example of a thought process and is not <br />intended to be construed as being real time data from diversion records. <br /> <br />The first page is a brief description of the export statute, the Compact and some <br />assumptions that have some resemblance to present day conditions. The purpose is not to <br />defend those assumptions but rather to use them to illustrate a day to day operation at the <br />Julesburg gage. <br /> <br />All three of the examples use native or natural flow at the State line. This flow is listed in <br />the first column labeled "Native Flow." It begins at 68 cfs and is incremented up in S cfs <br />steps until it reaches 130 cfs and then is incremented down until it reaches 43 cfs. <br /> <br />Example #1 is an example of what might happen should Tamarack begin to deliver water <br />to the State line without some specific change in the Compact. <br /> <br />Native Flow is that flow that would be at the State line without any additions from outside <br />sources. <br /> <br />Well Replace is water that would be released from the reservoir to cover calculated well <br />depletions that would be affecting the State line obligation. <br /> <br />Tamarack Recoverv is that water which is arriving at the State line by virtue of being <br />generated by reregulation plans specifically for the Recovery Plan. <br /> <br />Junior Diversions are ditch decrees that are junior to the Compact but senior to the wells. <br /> <br />Export Cost is the "fee of fifty dollars per acre-foot to be assessed and collected by the <br />state engineer on water diverted, carried, stored, or transported in this state for beneficial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.