Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald then reviewed several bills (S.B. 18, S.B. 19, <br />S.B. 86, H.B. 1055, H.B. 1119, and H.B. 1141) pending before the <br />General Assembly and reported the position, if any, which he had <br />taken on each bill. Mr. Robbins noted that he thought that the <br />Board should at least point out to the General Assembly that the <br />passage of S.B. 18 would effectively undo the instream flow appro- <br />priation program. Following some discussion, Mr. Robbins moved, <br />seconded by Mr. Fetcher, that the Board: (1) support paragraphs <br />(a), (b), and (c) of section 37-92-102(3), as that section would <br />be amended by section 1 of S.B. 18; and (2) instruct its Director <br />to inform the General Assembly that paragraph (d) of section <br />37-92-102(3), as that section would be amended by section 1 of the <br />bill, would, if enacted, make the instream flow program a nullity. <br />Considerable discussion ensued during which various points pro <br />and con were raised. Several members of the audience also com- <br />mented. Subsequently, Mr. RObbins, with the concurrence of his <br />second, withdrew the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnston <br />opposing S.B. 86. <br />discussion. <br /> <br />then moved that the Board go on record as <br />For want of a second, the motion died without <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald then reported on the matter of the Board's <br />membership in the Colorado Water Congress and the National Water <br />Resources Association. He noted that he had not paid the 1980 <br />dues to either organization, which dues totaled $1,000, based upon <br />budgetary constraints. However, that budgetary constraint no <br />longer existed. Despite this fact, Mr. McDonald indicated that <br />he felt that it was inappropriate for a state agency to be a mem- <br />ber of what he regarded as essentially a private-interest group. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued during the course of which Mr. Johnston <br />moved, seconded by Mr. Fetcher, that the Board not be a member of <br />the ColOrado Water Congress but that it pay a fee for services <br />received from the Water Congress (e.g., newsletters, legislative <br />materials, etc.). More discussion followed, at the close of which <br />the motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />The Board then proceeded to fix February II, 1981, as the <br />date for its next regular meeting, to be held in Denver. <br /> <br />There being no further business to come before the Board, <br />the meeting was adjourned by Mr. Jackson at 3:00 p.m. <br /> <br />- <br />. ~ <br />~- f <br />, <br />, <br />/ <br />, <br />~ <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />~, <br />~'. <br />~ <br /> <br />Robert A. Jac s <br />Vice-Chairman <br /> <br /> <br />~, <br />