Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />OF THE <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br /> <br />DENVER, COLORADO <br /> <br />JANUARY 16, 1981 <br /> <br />Pursuant to notice properly given (see Appendix A), the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board met on January 16, 1981, at <br />the Quality Inn, 1840 Sherman, Denver, Colorado. In the absence <br />of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, the meeting was called to <br />order at 8:55 a.m. by the Director, J. William McDonald. Members <br />in attendance were: <br /> <br />Robert A. Jackson <br />Vice-Chairman <br />Jeris A. Danielson <br />John R. Fetcher <br />C. M. Furneaux <br />Floyd L. Getz <br />Patrick A. Gormley <br /> <br />Richard W. Johnston <br />J. D. MacFarlane <br />J. William McDonald <br />D. Monte Pascoe <br />David W. Robbins <br />Herbert H. Vandemoer <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald indicated that the minutes of previous meetings <br />were not yet available for the Board's review and approval. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald stated that he desired to withdraw agenda item <br />2 concerning the instream flow recommendations for Jackson County. <br />He indicated that he had met with interested parties in Walden <br />on January 7, 1981, but had been unable to resolve issues con- <br />cerning the proposed appropriations. There being no objection, <br />no action was taken on this matter. <br /> <br />At this time, Mr. Jackson, Vice-Chairman, arrived and assumed <br />the chair. He asked Mr. McDonald to introduce agenda item 3. Mr. <br />McDonald proceeded to give a brief overview of his memorandum to <br />the Board (see Appendix B) and to explain why he had raised the <br />questions posited in that memorandum for the Board's consideration. <br />Mr. Jackson then asked each Board member to indicate if he desired <br />to deal with the issues raised in Mr. McDonald's memorandum. All <br />members agreed to so proceed, whereupon Mr. Jackson opened the <br />discussion to general comments from Board members. <br /> <br />Two hours of discussion ensued among Board members, during <br />which time various aspects of the purposes to be served by the <br />expenditure of construction fund monies were explored. It was <br />generally agreed that more .emphasis needed to be placed upon proj- <br />ects which furthered the development of Colorado's compact entitle- <br />ments. In addition, there was considerable discussion of how the <br />