My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02623
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/1/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />in the Colorado River a decision was made by the oil companies to <br />eliminate return flows. This obviously increased the water require- <br />ments. For that reason the estimates made by the staff of the board <br />are considerably higher than any other estimates made either by the <br />federal government or by private consultants. All the estimates are I <br />based on a one million barrel per day production. Our estimate <br />today is that a one million barrel per day production will require <br />about 250,000 acre-feet of water annually, which is over 100,000 feet <br />higher than our 1959 estimates. <br /> <br />There is one other parameter that hasn't been mentioned in connection <br />with the water use and which could account for a large amount of <br />water. That is the water required to produce electrical energy to <br />serve the oil shale industry. We actually have three factors in <br />estimating the water requirements of the oil shale industry. One, <br />is the direct consumption by the industry itself. The second is the <br />consumption by the associated population growth. The third is the <br />consumption attributable to the production of electrical energy to <br />serve the oil shale industry. The industry will require great amounts <br />of electrical energy. So the problem really falls into three dif- <br />ferent categories. This is the reason we have constantly increased <br />our figures to come up with a quarter of a million acre-feet of <br />water annually for a million barrel per day industry. <br /> <br />Mr. Kilburn: I read your figures, Mr. Sparks. I was trying to see <br />if I could argue with them earlier and I recomputed our use which <br />would be 7,500 acre-feet per year for 50,000 barrels per day. <br />Multiplying that by 20, which is a conunon practice to get a million <br />barrel a day industry, we arrive at 150,000 acre-feet. But that does <br />not include the new population which would up it to 175,000 acre- <br />feet. The electric thing I don't have any figures on, but we are <br />getting up towards your figure, I am afraid. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Can somebody tell us more about the water use for <br />electrical power? I am not knowledgeable at all about that. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: Ben, could I ask a question that would lead right into <br />that? <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: All right, fine. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: What is the primary source of thermal energy for your <br />process ? <br /> <br />Mr. Kilburn: Well, initially we would import natural gas to get the <br />process going; then we would use our own fuel. So it would be <br />completely internal energy for crushing the rock using our own fuels <br />to obtain the heat eventually. We would take a fraction of the <br />yield and turn it back into the plant. I donlt have the figures for <br />the fuel required at the various stages, but it would not be a <br />terrific amount. We would not be importing any fuel after the.first <br />initial start-up. Obviously, using our own fuel is cheaper than <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.