My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02623
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/1/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />vegetation. The white areas do contain some vegetation, primarily, <br />sage brush. A very indifferent and unproductive soil I guess you <br />could say, because the soil has been literally all eroded off in <br />the rock at this point and you have little vegetation at all. Only <br />on the north and east slope do you see shrubs and trees. In short, <br />we feel we can increase the productivity and the wildlife carrying <br />capacity in Davis Gulch by quite a bit. <br /> <br />(slide) Now here is a slide we put together listing the total number <br />of studies that we have done on the Colony property since 1969. They <br />total 113 studies. Twenty-four in air quality, 17 related to water, <br />6 plans mine related, 9 pipeline, and so forth and so on. It looks <br />like an enormous number of studies and yet when you take a feature <br />like water you have such a thing as the water consumption and the <br />mining dust control, for example, and crushing control and pretty <br />soon the number increases a great deal. <br /> <br />(slide) Taking one aspect of revegetation. Our program began back in <br />1965 actually, and has continued with roughly a new cropping every <br />year or so. As we found out certain things we had to establish a <br />new plot to find out new things. We feel'very confident. now in oUr <br />revegetation work. We can grow native species in shale. <br /> <br />(slide) This is one of our early plots called the boxed plot estab- <br />lished in 1967 with grass, cr~ted wheat grass. When the picture <br />was taken it had existed four years without water, without supple- <br />mental water or fertilizers. It is now six years and it looks very <br />much the same. Other species fell by the wayside as you can see 'by <br />some of the empty spots. <br /> <br />(slide) These two pictures illustrate what plants do in processed <br />shale with and without fertilizer. <br /> <br />(slide) This is without fertilizer. <br /> <br />(slide) This is with fertilizer. <br /> <br />(slide) You can see that without fertilizer the species on the left <br />is doing fairly well, but I assure you that it won't make it for <br />long. <br /> <br />(slide) The shale has to be leached before you can get growth like <br />that and that was the case in the 1968 plot here by the plant. It <br />has to be mulched. <br /> <br />(slide) And here it is. I like to poke fun at my engineering friends. <br />How did they get that fertilizer spread on there in such bad shape? <br />You can see the dark green where they obviously got a lot of nitro- <br />gen into it, and the white color there is a difference. I think <br />that kind of growth would satisfy us on our own lawns. <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.