Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />Miccosukee lawsuit <br /> <br />. A decision that came out of the 11 th Circuit Court o(Appeals regarding a lawsuit filed by the . <br />Miccosukee Tribe in Florida and a similar ruling in tpe 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals concerning a <br />New York City transbasin diversion may have implications on Western States transmountain <br />diversions. <br />. The Miccosukee Tribe and the Friends of the Everglades brought a citizen suit under the Clean <br />Water Act against the South Florida Water Managerp.ent District, alleging that the Water District <br />was violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants from one of its pump stations into a <br />basin known as Water Conservation Area-3A (which was historically part of the Everglades) <br />without a national pollution discharge elimination system (NPDES) permit. <br />. The district court granted the plaintiffs' request, and'enjoined the Water District from operating its <br />pump station without an NPDES permit. The Water District appealed from the district court's order <br />declaring unlawful the Water District's operation of its pump station without an NPDES permit. <br />. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision. <br />. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving New York City issued a similar ruling. <br />. New York City is using a tunnel for its transbasin diversion. The tunnel was ruled as a discharge <br />point, thus requiring an NPDES permit. <br />. New York City is considering appealing the ruling and simultaneously is negotiating a settlement. <br />. The use oftunnels and other structures to divert water from one basin to another is common in <br />Colorado. The 2nd Circuit Court's decision may complicate transmountain diversions in Colorado <br />and other western states. <br /> <br />WO- WO related legislation <br /> <br />. All items on the CWCB's Project bill, except for th(j Colorado River Return Project (CRRP), have . <br />been approved. <br />. The CRRP bill has been reintroduced, this time in the Senate. <br />. House Bill 1146 relates to consideration of potential water quality impacts in change cases. We <br />understand that a Colorado Water Congress amendment regarding giving deference to water <br />quality standards was adopted. <br />. As a result of a $2 million General Fund budget cut; a bill may soon be introduced, proposing to <br />increase wastewater discharge permit fees, as well ~s initiating a new fee for public water systems <br />in order to sanction continued operations of certain YVQCD programs that were delegated by the <br />EPA. <br /> <br />WOCC's briefing of House-Senate Joint Ag Committee <br /> <br />. The WQCC will present its annual briefing before the House-Senate Joint Ag Committee on March <br />12,2003 at 7:30 am. The briefing will include three main points: <br />. Update on the status of the Colorado Nonpoint Sou~ce Program <br />. Update on the Section 309 Study ; <br />. Update on the on-going negotiations with the EP A 90ncerning Colorado's Section 303 (d) list of <br />impaired water bodies for 2002. <br /> <br />Colorado Watershed Protection Fund <br /> <br />. Final Program Guidance was adopted by both the WQCC and CWCB at their respective meetings . <br />in January 2003. <br /> <br />44 <br />