My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02599
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/23/1998
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Program - Status Report - Letter from the Secretary of the Interior to Al Gore
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-- <br /> <br />APPENDIX C <br /> <br />GLEN CANYON DAM 1998 ANNUAL PLAN OF OPERATIONS <br />PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATING CRITERIA <br />DEVELOPED FOR THE GRAND CANYON PROTECTION ACT <br /> <br />This plan is prepared in conformance with section 1804(c)(I)(A) of the GCPA. Any changes <br />to the plan would require reconsultation in accordance with this Act. <br /> <br />In water year 1997, Glen Canyon Dam was operated in accordance with the criteria <br />established in response to the 1992 Grand Canyon Protection Act, including the constraints <br />on daily fluctuations and ramping rates. Since the annual release volume was 13.8 maf, <br />powerplant releases were above normal for much of the year. In portions of February, March, <br />June, and July, average daily releases were 27,000 cfs, and thus were released at a steady <br />flow rate. Lake Powell's peak elevation for the year was 3,695 feet and no water bypassed <br />the powerplant. <br /> <br />~. <br />1.3 <br /> <br />As a result of the preparation of the Annual Operating Plan under the 1968 Colorado River <br />Basin Project Act, monthly release volumes from Glen Canyon Dam during 1998 are <br />expected to range from 600,000 af to 1,200,000 af. Under the most probably inflow <br />conditions in water year 1998, Glen Canyon Dam is expected to release about 10.75 maf <br />through the Grand Canyon to Lake Mead. This is about 2.5 maf greater than the minimum <br />objective release and is the result of high reservoir storage in both Lakes Powell and Mead. <br />Lake Powell is expected to fill in July. Monthly updates to these release projections will be <br />made throughout the year. <br /> <br />With current projected monthly release volumes, hourly powerplant releases will exceed <br />20,000 cfs from October through the month of January and again during the summer peak <br />months of July and August, when monthly release volumes are at their highest for the year. <br />Average daily releases of20,000 cfs are expected during these months. rfaverage daily <br />releases above 25,000 cfs are made, they will be made as steady flows. Projected daily <br />allowable fluctuations therefore will be between 6,000 cfs and 8,000 cfs (see criteria). <br />Minimum releases of 5,000 cfs at night and 8,000 cfs during the day and ramping rates of <br />4,000 cfslhr increasing and 1,500 cfslhr decreasing will be followed. All of the above is <br />outlined in the Record of Decision implementing the preferred alternative of the GCDEIS. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />With the strong current EI Niiio Southern Oscillation anomaly, there is some indication that <br />winter precipitation could be higher than normal in the southem portion of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin, and that spring precipitation could also be higher than normal in the <br />northern portion of the Basin. Since there are concerns for resulting unplanned spills from <br />Glen Canyon Dam, releases from Glen Canyon Dam are expected to be higher than normal <br />during the fall months in order to achieve a prudent January I, 1998, reservoir storage level. <br />Releases throughout the year will be made in such a way so as to reduce the risk of <br />uncontrolled spring releases that could result from large forecast errors similar to that which <br />occurred in 1983. ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.