My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02598
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02598
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/18/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: The purpose of identifying floodplains in the first place <br />is to prohibit that type of thing from occurring. Once you have <br />identified the floodplains then you attach restrictions to their use <br />to prevent bridges from causing flooding. <br /> <br />Mr. Benton: Another question, Larry. Could this have any conceivable <br />effect on the disposition of the spent shale over there in the west <br />end of Garfield County? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: It could have some effect upon any activity within a flood- <br />plain, assuming it is within an area and has been designated as a flood- <br />plain. The vast majority of the floodplains in Colorado will never <br />come under this category because they do not present a foreseeable <br />hazard. We have thousands of miles of floodplains in national forests, <br />BUM lands, and others that are not likely to present any foreseeable <br />hazard. It is only in an area where we can foresee development that <br />we are talking about. But as time goes on that area is obviously going <br />to change. There is no way we can delineate all the flood hazard areas <br />by 1976 or by the year 2076. The pattern of growth will continue to <br />change. It will be a continuing problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: Larry, it is my understanding that this proposed regula- <br />tion is due by the end of this month. Is that what you say in this <br />letter? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Yes, I hadn't got to that yet, John. I was only talking <br />to the method for applying for assistance. <br /> <br />There are two things that have to be done in connection with the flood- <br />plain problem. One, is the identification of the floodplain. That 111 <br />a very large and expensive task. The second is the regulation of the <br />fioodplains after they are identified. That is what the proposed <br />regulation is for. So there are two separate steps which have to be <br />gone through. One, the identification, second, the regulation. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: Well, 1 am ready for that one when you are. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeger: Larry, on the identification, this will be done with water <br />board assistance? <br /> <br />~. Sparks: Yes. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeger: Dollar-wise? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Yes. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeger: When you speak of floodplain mileages you are referring <br />to river mileages, stream mileages. rather than perimeters. Is that <br />right? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Yes, simply linear miles. Obviously the floodplains will <br />vary greatly in width and we are only speaking of the linear distance. <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.