My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02588
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/24/1999
Description
Directors' Reports
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Management Committee: On <br />May 12 the Management Committee of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery <br />met in Denver, The members updated each other about current activities and discussed several <br />items of importance (see memos under Agenda Item #9 for additional information). <br /> <br />The staff has discussed the current situation regarding instream flow filings to recover <br />endangered fish with the AG's Office and the Division of Wildlife. The Board has withdrawn the <br />recovery flow filings it filed and there is a status conference with a referee from Water District V <br />regarding base flow filings on June 5. If the water court referee recommends that these filings be <br />dismissed, the Management Committee expects an opportunity to discuss next steps, since flow <br />protection components of the Recovery Action Plan will need to be revised (by consensus) and <br />the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service issues Section 7 decisions for water development activities <br />based upon those and other components, <br /> <br />The Committee also discussed a draft scope-of-work it has received from a consultant <br />who would be hired to expedite the development of fish recovery goals, At its April 1 meeting, <br />the Recovery Program's Implementation Committee changed the due date for the completion of <br />recovery goals to FY 2000. The anticipated cost is $60,000. Also discussed was the current <br />status of planning in the Yampa River Basin, information and education coordination, the <br />reintroduction ofbonytail in Colorado (and possible impediments resulting from a new state law <br />that requires the general Assembly to approve the reintroduction of species), the status of FY -99 <br />capital funds, operation and maintenance funding, and extending the program's cooperative <br />agreement beyond 2003, The next Implementation Committee meeting will be in August. <br /> <br />News concerning the Section 7 consultation is provided in a separate memo prepared for <br />Agenda Item # 9(0). <br /> <br />Cutthroat Trout Agreement: The DOW has signed an agreement with Wyoming, Utah <br />and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to recover the Colorado River cutthroat trout throughout <br />its historic range. Under the agreement, an estimated 1,754 miles of streams and 652 acres of <br />lakes in the three states will be protected and/or restored to maintain more than 400 populations <br />of the native fish, which has been reduced to less than one percent of its former range, <br /> <br />The Colorado River cutthroat is one of a growing list of sensitive, threatened or <br />endangered aquatic species -- including the greenback and Rio Grande cutthroat trout, boreal <br />toad, Rio Grande chub and sucker, Arkansas darter, the Rocky Mountain capshell snail, the <br />humpback and bonytail chub and Colorado pikeminnow the state is working to restore. <br /> <br />. Colorado River cutthroat trout numbers were drastically reduced at the turn of the century <br />by over fishing, water diversions, and pollution from mining and habitat destruction from <br />overgrazing. As non-natives like rainbow trout were introduced to make up for the loss of the <br />cutthroat populations, hybridization with the non-natives began to weaken the species' purity. <br />Strategies to restore the Colorado River cutthroat involve removal of non-native trout from <br />targeted stream reaches and high mountain lakes, building barriers to prevent recolonization, and <br />monitoring watersheds, lake and stream habitats and instream flows to detect threats. <br /> <br />The three-state, 10-year strategy involves restoring degraded ecosystems by coordinating <br />land-use activities with the needs of the fish, improving lake and stream habitat and maintaining <br />adequate flows, water levels and water quality, In Colorado, 30 stream reaches and lakes (27 in <br />the upper Yampa basin, two in the Dolores basin and one in the Gunnison basin) will be <br />protected, and 31 (13 in the upper Colorado River, six in the Gunnison, one in the San Juan <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.