My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02571
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:17:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/5/1958
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />REPORT ON ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS <br />OF <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />To <br />GOVERNOR STEPHEN L. R. McNICHOlB <br />From <br />L. N. McCLELLAN, Consulting Engineer <br /> <br />May 27, 1958 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In accordance with your request I have studied the <br />organization and operations of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board. I have discussed its operations with a number of per- <br />sons who are familiar with the Board's activities and I have <br />read the minutes of the meetings of the Board in recent years. <br />After making this review, I have come to the conclusion that <br />the Director's office is understaffed. <br /> <br />ORGANIZATION OF DIRECTOR'S OFFICE <br /> <br />As presently organized, the Director has to spend a <br />large part of his time attending numerous meetings and on rou- <br />tine administrative matters. There are three Basin inter- <br />agency committees that Colorado is concerned with, each of <br />which holds from six to eight meetings a year. There are the <br />Governor's conferences on water problems, meetings of the Upper <br />Colorado River Commission, National Reclamation Association <br />meetings, the Director has had to appear at hearings at Wash- <br />ington of the Bureau of the Budget and of the appropriation <br />committees of Congress, and many others. <br /> <br />As a result of these many demands on his time, the <br />Director apparently has not been able to work as closely as he <br />might have desired with the local water user groups and others <br />interested in water utilization plans and problems. Some of the <br />misunderstandings and lack of local agreement and support for <br />the State's water development plans might have been avoided <br />had there been a closer working arrangement between the Direc- <br />tor's office and the water users at local level. <br /> <br />It seems to me that one of the most important func- <br />tions of the Director's office is to confer with the local peo- <br />ple on water problems; explain the Board's policies, problems I <br />and objectives; and get the local people's ideas and sugges- <br />tions as to how they desire to have their local areas devel- <br />oped. It is very important to have local understanding and <br />support for any proposed irrigation development. We have learned <br />from past experiences that we don't get very far in obtaining <br />authorizations for projects or in obtaining appropriations from <br />the Federal Government for construction of projects when there <br />is lack of local support for, or where there is actual local <br />opposition to, the proposed projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.