Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.J <br /> <br />~) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />'g.... - 't. <br />~~~~~~~~~~~~~v'vvVV'Jvl.. :' .)'VVVV^VV'Jv~~~~~~~~~~V <br /> <br />".J1" <br /> <br /> <br />Originally the Water Resources Commission could establish an ISF on its own motion, but this was no longer <br />ssible after the 1987 Ie . slation <br /> <br />Entities Authorized to RequestJRecol)lmend/Administer-'nstrcam Flo." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Scenic Waterways administered primarily by State PaIks and Recreation Deparbnent with involvement by <br />Division of State Lands, Oregon State Marine Board and Oregon Water Resources Deparbnent <br />ISF water rights requested from the Water Resources Commission, The Water Resources Deparbnent (WRD) <br />holds instream water rights (Mattick 1993) <br />Department ofFish and Wildlife, Deparbnent of Environmental Quality and State PaIks and Recreation <br />De ent can a I for ISF water ri ts (Mattick 1993 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Process for Securin~ Instream Flow Ri~hts or Reservations - - <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ORS ~~537.332 through 537.343 provide the process by which designated state agencies can request instream <br />flows. (Kaufman 1992) <br />As mentioned in the "legal recognition" section, the application process is scrutinized for creating too much <br />delay from time of filing to final appropriation. The rulemaking process in general creates substantial public <br />involvement, but this is at the cost of dela in fina1 a ro riation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-. <br />..!,ublic Participation . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1992 rules amended to ensure all persons or groups had a fair and equal opportunity to express public interest <br />concerns during review of applications. <br />Individuals can acquire water rights and convert them to ISF water rights (which are then held in trust by the <br />DWR Mattick 1993 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ ProTected Benc'licial Uses of Instream Flows <br /> <br />. Protected uses include: "fish life, wildlife, fish and wildlife habitat'.. "water quality standards". and ''recreation <br />and scenic attraction" [ORS ~537.336] <br />. Since the adoption of the ISF Water Rights statute in 1987, recreational instream use has been an expressly <br />recognized ISF use. A recreational right may he applied for by the Department ofPaIks and Recreation for a <br />uanti that rovides a desirable level for recreation and scenic attraction. ORS 537.336 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />- -- - -- --~ - - - <br />Acquisition Program. <br /> <br />. Acquisition methods exist in Oregon and include transfers, leases and conserved water projects. Leases are <br />limited to 5 years with the option to renew_The majority of transfers are permanent transfers. <br />. Any entity can purcbase, lease or receive as a gift any water right for instream use. but the converted use must <br />be held in trust b WRD Rice 2004 <br /> <br />. - - <br />Flow Quantification Methods <br /> <br />. IFM and versions, and the Oregon method <br />. Flows are quantified to meet the following goals: <br />. "[cJonservation, maintenance and enhancement of aquatic and fish life, wildlife. and fish and wildlife <br />habitat."... Deparbnent of Fish & Wildlife <br />. "[t]o provide desirable levels for 'recreation and scenic attraction".... Parks and Recreation Department <br />. " uanti necess for lIution abatement"... De arbnentofEnvironmental Quali ORS 537.336 <br /> <br /> <br />. Monitoring and Enforcement .. . - . - - - - <br /> <br />. To prioritize monitoring. the WRD works with the Deptartment ofFish and Wildlife to determine critical <br />streams and rivers for monitoring and measure flows in most sensitive areas. <br />. When instream flows are not hein met, the water master is authorized to shut off 'unior users (French 2004 <br /> <br />Oregon <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />3 <br />