My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02551
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/11/1965
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />on that ratio. The state of Colorado gets <br />51.75 percent of the water that remains at <br />Lee Ferry theoretically, after we take care <br />of our burdens to the Lower Basin. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I figured 750,000 for Old nexico but I <br />did not figure any depletion of our reser- <br />voirs because of evaporation and if I had <br />figured the evaporation that would amount to <br />about 750,000. So my figures are accurate, <br />I think, without taking into consideration <br />the delivery to old Nexico. tinder the present <br />virgin flow of the river for this present ten- <br />year cycle, and following the formulas that <br />have been established by the two compacts <br />with respect to the water of the Colorado <br />River, Colorado would only get 1,602,130 <br />acre-feet of water a year. That isn't enough <br />to take care of our present expenditures of <br />water. New Mexico would get 348,290; utah <br />would get 712,057; and Wyoming would get <br />433,426. Northeast Arizona would get 50,000 <br />acre-feet of water annually. They are already <br />taking some of that \'later, but very little, <br />for their powerplants. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />So, if my figures are accurate, and I <br />believe that they are accurate, and if my <br />interpretation of the compacts is accurate, <br />and I believe that it is accurate, outside <br />of that one question of delivery of water to <br />~~xico and the evaporation charge that might <br />be made, then if my figures are accurate, the <br />shortage is of today. I have figured out the <br />total water, including the surplus water in <br />the Upper Basin, and as I figure, the total <br />water supply in this ten-year period on an <br />annual basis is 4,213,703. Now this particu- <br />lar ten-year period is a low water period. <br />It's one of the dry periods but it's not the <br />lowest water period that we have on record. <br />The lowest water period occurred in 1931 and <br />until 1940. Less water was produced at that <br />time than was produced in this present ten- <br />year period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.